Master the Creative Process | Twyla Tharp

Andrew Huberman: You have a reputation for having risen early and gotten to the gym by 5:00 a.m., for two hours day in after day out. Tell us about that ritual, and do you still enjoy it?

Twyla Tharp: It's not a ritual, and I never enjoyed it. It's a reality, and you do it because you need an instrument that you can challenge. Just set the mechanism for the day, you're going to have to do it. It's kind of boring, and it's kind of loathsome.

Andrew Huberman: Could you give us a bit of insight into your inner dialogue around days when you don't want to go? Is there a self-talk or have you learned to push aside the voice that says, "Maybe not today"?

Twyla Tharp: It's simple. If you don't work when you don't want to work, you're not going to be able to work when you do want to work.

Andrew Huberman: Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast, where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life.

Andrew Huberman: I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. My guest today is Twyla Tharp. Twyla Tharp is a world-renowned dancer and choreographer.

Andrew Huberman: Her on-stage and film works easily place her not just in the top one percent of all choreographers of all time, but also among the top tier of all creative artists past and present. I knew I wanted to host Twyla on this podcast after listening to her book, "The Creative Habit," where she spells out how to build a schedule, habits, and routines that make your best creative expressions come to life. What I love about it is it's direct and it's action-oriented. There's nothing mystical about it.

Andrew Huberman: She explains in her book how even for people that have just one hour a day to write or sing or draw or paint or whatever, to get the most from that time in terms of creative output. Then, as I learned more about her, I was also super impressed that even in her 60s, by the way, she's 84 now, she could deadlift more than 200 pounds, which is more than twice her body weight, bench press her body weight for three clean repetitions, and was taking up boxing to keep her movement and reflexes sharp.

Andrew Huberman: As you'll see today, she is a phenom, and it comes by way of hard work. She's still in the gym every single morning at 5:00 a.m. for two full hours. Today, we discuss how to build self-discipline in and around your creative mind, and we discuss movement as a language. There's this new idea emerging in neuroscience that bodily movement, then music, and then speech, is how humans came to communicate with each other. We discuss that and how movement can help us process and explain our emotions and our ideas.

Andrew Huberman: We also discuss Twyla's life growing up on a farm and how that shaped her mindset about work and community. And we also talk about what it means to have and express your unique creativity and how to evolve your sense of taste. Oh yeah, and we also discuss telepathy. You'll notice the rapport between Twyla and I is very different than is typical for other Huberman Lab podcasts I've done. She is a real firecracker, and we had a ton of fun exploring and challenging ideas, mostly her challenging me.

Andrew Huberman: It was a true honor and pleasure to learn from such a virtuoso of the arts and, frankly, of life. And as you'll soon learn, we can all learn a lot from Twyla. Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford. It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science-related tools to the general public. In keeping with that theme, today's episode does include sponsors. And now for my discussion with Twyla Tharp.

Andrew Huberman: Twyla Tharp, welcome.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: Huge fan. Huge, huge fan, and love, love, love your book, "The Creative Habit."

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: It's just an incredible book, and it's taught me so much. And I want to talk about that today, but I want to talk about a bunch of things. Let's start with what a spine is. I think this is such an important component of the book, and this concept of a spine, and the way I think about this is that many, many people feel they might have something inside them that they want to put into the world.

Andrew Huberman: They want to access their creativity, or they're creative, and there's so much information out there about how to go about that. But this notion of a spine is really critical because it keeps us on track. Otherwise, it can be a wandering in the desert, suddenly you're swimming in the ocean, suddenly the phone, you get a text. And please explain what a spine is and why this is such a vital concept for anyone that wants to create anything.

Twyla Tharp: "Spine" means focus. "Spine" means concentration. If you think about it geometrically, the spine is the center, both laterally and vertically. So, if we're talking physically, you have a right and a left side, you have a top, and you have a bottom, and these elements are connected through the center, right? So, they have to be coordinated. You simply cannot function.

Twyla Tharp: If your right side is going one way and then your left side's going this other way, you're going nowhere. So you have to move off your center. In terms of how you organize information, there's also a center to it. It's like, okay, over here you have this and this, and you can transfer what you understand from this arena to inform this side, but it has to pass through a common point, and that common point is the center.

Twyla Tharp: And until you feel that or one, anyone working, either physically or, let's use the word very broadly and generically, artistically, until you know where you are grounded, where you feel the most confident that you are, what you said, you're at sea. You could be going this way, that way, unless you know how to navigate from the stars, which few people do anymore, you're screwed.

Andrew Huberman: So when I think about a spine in a scientific paper, I was taught there can only really be one major conclusion, maybe two, but one major conclusion of any paper, even though the data set probably points to 50 different things that are potentially interesting.

Andrew Huberman: In terms of a podcast or a movie or a book, it's sometimes not obvious to the reader or to the listener or to the observer what the spine is, but my understanding is that the creator has to understand what the spine is going into it.

Andrew Huberman: So could you give a couple of examples from your own work, and maybe if they come to mind, a couple of examples from visual arts or movies or something where it's clear to the creator what the spine is, but it might not be entirely clear to the person watching or consuming the content?

Twyla Tharp: I am a great fan of Agatha Christie and Jonathan Carr, okay? And the reason why is because from the get-go, you know there is one conclusion, but their job is to keep you away from that conclusion for as long as possible.

Andrew Huberman: Who did the crime.

Twyla Tharp: Who did the crime? Who's the killer? Who, whatta, whatta. What is the crime, for starters? And they'll delay as long as they can in their singular style, definite modes. I mean, Agatha Christie, her format is practically that of a sonnet.

Twyla Tharp: I'm sure you could actually count words, and I've never seen a study that shows a long, "Okay, she's going to do red herring number one X words in, and this is where she's going to throw in the extra crime to push the tension up to get it to go to here." But we all know we're playing the same game. I think that anyone who is successful in communicating with other people gains their trust, gains their confidence that you're not going to screw them.

Andrew Huberman: How much do you think it's important to get into the audience's mind about what they want, or is the spine coming solely from the creator? Is it about the creator's relationship to the work, or are you thinking about what the audience wants and what they need?

Twyla Tharp: The question about audience and intention is sort of a sensitive one because it's, okay, are you manipulating the audience and are you there just to take advantage of them, or at the other extreme of that spectrum, are you doing it because you're in an ivory tower and you're off here doing your own investigations and maybe they connect, maybe they don't, who cares, right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Those are the two extremes: total manipulation of audience, total disregard of audience. And depending on who I'm working for or with, I do both.

Andrew Huberman: To me, it seems like it's one of the toughest things as a creator to both want to honor your audience's wishes, but you also have something that you want to communicate, and we never know how things are going to land. But for somebody who wants to create something, maybe we could orient them toward their own spine or to the spine of the work. Where does that start?

Twyla Tharp: Well, I think that the word "intention" is so vague these days. But why are you doing this? What is your purpose in doing it? What's your interest? Why do you want to do this? What's in it for you? Are you to learn? Is this a contract signed? Do you have an obligation to be successful to a producer who's investing a lot of money, and that's a given going in?

Twyla Tharp: That's going to determine a range of possibilities for you, right? And unfortunately, the bottom line controls a lot of this issue. At least for me, it's a given if I've signed a contract to deliver a specific result, that's what I'm doing. It doesn't matter what I want. It's do I get that accomplished or not?

Twyla Tharp: It's in a way a kind of sacred bond, okay? You honor your contracts. On the other hand, if I am not in a singular position of earning any money, I can do anything I want, or anything, not that I want, but anything that I think is important, okay? So how do you determine the parameters of important because that helps with intention.

Twyla Tharp: In the olden days, which dates as in before 1979, anything before '79 is the olden days. In the olden days, that would include the '60s. We did things because we wanted to change the direction the Earth rotated. End of story. Good luck.

Andrew Huberman: Tell me more about that.

Twyla Tharp: It simply meant that whoever the practitioner was was completely exposed to everything. Say you're a painter. You're completely exposed to everything everybody is doing, and you see another way of going about it, and you do that. Everybody is plugged into that same mechanism, and if they swerve into your area, you shift again. You have to continuously be altering perception as an artist. That notion does not seem so relevant these days, perhaps.

Andrew Huberman: Why do you think that is?

Twyla Tharp: Because you could live cheaper. In the '60s, you could live very cheap. Now you cannot live very cheaply as an artistic force. You're paying bills, lots of bills.

Andrew Huberman: I've long thought that the best work that people do is at the beginning, when they don't have any feedback yet, and they're just being themselves. It's hard to stay connected to that early energy of just being oneself without the notion of contracts and feedback, and the perception of feedback. Do you think it's important?

Twyla Tharp: I've never been of the persuasion that my understanding was the greatest when I knew nothing as when I knew more.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: I've always been of the persuasion that the more you know, the bigger your challenge. If one looks at the lives of artists, for example, Beethoven. Take Beethoven early work, take Beethoven late work, very different, different challenges.

Twyla Tharp: There is argument to be made, depending on your particular set of the coherency of the classicism of the earlier quartets as opposed to the late quartets, and the total disillusion that he was able to accomplish at the end of his career, totally taking the sound world apart that he could only actually do because he was deaf.

Twyla Tharp: He had developed, during the course, unfortunately, of a very long time, decades, the awareness that he was losing his hearing, and by the end, he genuinely basically was completely deaf, which forced him into his own world, and there he looked at himself across the ages.

Twyla Tharp: So in a piece, I think of the "Diabelli," which is the last thing he wrote for keyboard after the sonatas, and he actually had started the "Diabelli" 15, maybe even... I'm forgetting my details here, but 15 years earlier than when he came back to complete it.

Twyla Tharp: And he got bored with it initially because, to a younger composer, it wasn't challenging enough. When he came back to it later, he had a humility about him that said, "That theme which I used to poo-poo because it's like you're kidding," ya da, da, di, ba, ba, da, da, da, da. Up. Ya, da, da, di, da, ba, ya, da, da, da. Up. Ya, da, da, di. Cut in half. Ya, da, da, di. Drop it back down. Ya, da, da, di, da.

Twyla Tharp: And he's going, "What?" And later he comes back, and he says, "Right. Not stupid, simple. I could never have written anything that simple or that useful." And he finished it, and it's arguably the greatest set of keyboard variations in the entire repertoire.

Twyla Tharp: Which do you want? The earlier Beethoven? The Beethoven who has passed way through many different works, a mass, an opera, many quartets, and returns to it with this new information to look at it again.

Andrew Huberman: Fascinating. There's something about the more you know, the bigger your challenge, but if I may, from what you just said, maybe also the bigger the opportunity.

Twyla Tharp: Totally.

Twyla Tharp: Totally. But the more kind of distracting it is and the harder it is to focus. Part of that's physical, but part of it is also that there are many more options available with accomplishments, if you will, but you have to be selective about what you have available to you to work with.

Twyla Tharp: In the earlier phase, you'll take what you can get, and now, if you take what you can get, you will be very wildly distracted by everything.

Andrew Huberman: I'd like to take a quick break to acknowledge our sponsor, Our Place. Our Place makes my favorite pots, pans, and other cookware. Surprisingly, toxic compounds such as PFAS or forever chemicals are still found in 80% of non-stick pans, as well as utensils, appliances, and countless other kitchen products.

Andrew Huberman: As I've discussed before on this podcast, these PFAS or forever chemicals like Teflon, have been linked to major health issues such as hormone disruption, gut microbiome disruption, fertility issues, and many other health problems. So it's very important to avoid them. This is why I'm a huge fan of Our Place. Our Place products are made with the highest quality materials and are all PFAS and toxin-free. I particularly love their Titanium Always Pan Pro. It's the first non-stick pan made with zero chemicals and zero coating.

Andrew Huberman: Instead, it uses pure titanium. This means it has no harmful forever chemicals and does not degrade or lose its nonstick effect over time. It's also beautiful to look at. I cook eggs in my Titanium Always Pan Pro almost every morning. The design allows for the eggs to cook perfectly without sticking to the pan. I also cook burgers and steaks in it, and it always puts a really nice sear on the meat. But again, nothing sticks to it, so it's really easy to clean, and it's even dishwasher safe. I love it, and I use it constantly.

Andrew Huberman: Our Place now has a full line of Titanium Pro cookware that uses the first-of-its-kind titanium non-stick technology. For a limited time, Our Place is offering an extra 10% off their current holiday sale on their titanium cookware. Visit fromourplace.com/huberman and use the code SAVEHUBERMAN10 to claim the offer. With a 100-day risk-free trial, free shipping, and free returns, you can try this fantastic cookware with zero risk.

Andrew Huberman: Today's episode is also brought to us by Eight Sleep. Eight Sleep makes smart mattress covers with cooling, heating, and sleep-tracking capacity. One of the best ways to ensure you get a great night's sleep is to make sure that the temperature of your sleeping environment is correct, and that's because in order to fall asleep and stay deeply asleep, your body temperature actually has to drop by about one to three degrees.

Andrew Huberman: And in order to wake up feeling refreshed and energized, your body temperature actually has to increase by about one to three degrees. Eight Sleep automatically regulates the temperature of your bed throughout the night according to your unique needs. I've been sleeping on an Eight Sleep mattress cover for nearly five years now, and it has completely transformed and improved the quality of my sleep. The latest Eight Sleep model is the Pod 5. This is what I'm now sleeping on, and I absolutely love it. It has so many incredible features.

Andrew Huberman: For instance, the Pod 5 has a feature called "Autopilot," which is an AI engine that learns your sleep patterns and then adjusts the temperature of your sleeping environment across different sleep stages. It'll even elevate your head if you're snoring, and it makes other shifts to optimize your sleep. If you would like to try Eight Sleep, go to eightsleep.com/huberman to get 450 dollars off the Pod 5 Ultra. This is part of Eight Sleep's extended holiday sale, which goes from now until December 31st, 2025.

Andrew Huberman: Eight Sleep ships to many countries worldwide, including Mexico and the UAE. Again, that's eightsleep.com/huberman to save up to 450 dollars now through December 31st, 2025.

Andrew Huberman: Recently, I listened to a conversation between my good friend Rick Rubin, who we were talking about earlier. He's a big fan of yours. You inspired his book, and he wanted me to tell you that.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: And he was speaking with Gwyneth Paltrow, who's an actress and has done incredible things in the health and wellness business, et cetera, and she said something very interesting.

Twyla Tharp: Uh-huh.

Andrew Huberman: She said, "People generally like to keep you where they found you." And it's an interesting statement that I think taps into something that, again, that as a creator or as a consumer of creative content, feels very true, that we encounter somebody, like somebody goes to one of your dances, or we see a great movie with Gary Oldman in it or something.

Andrew Huberman: You see a Basquiat for the first time, and it either impacts you or it doesn't. But if it does, there's this tendency to want to keep that person and the work they do in that place. It's like we think we own the creator in some way, and the work, in this very naive and selfish way. Do you think that creates a real problem for anyone that's trying to put things into the world?

Andrew Huberman: Because, as you stated, with time, the creator gains knowledge. You evolve your craft. But your fan base, the people that love you, they love you for something that you're not really any longer. You're evolving.

Twyla Tharp: "The Somewhere Over the Rainbow syndrome," right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Garland always was asked for one song, or Elvis, John. Anyone is always asked for their hit because everyone wants to touch upon that which seems to somehow be their greatest accomplishment. It's aggravating. I mean, obviously, it's called cubby-holing, and for the person doing the work, there are artists who work serially, right?

Twyla Tharp: Who work in series and who make incremental changes, and they kind of have, in a way, a stab at the best of all possible worlds. But there are others who feel that, "Okay, you got that. I got to go over here." And that's because, in a way, they're right, because if you want to constantly be gain... It's a game. You want to be gaining the attention, you do it by change. You don't do it by reinforcing.

Twyla Tharp: That just creates a comfort zone, and it can build a reputation. It can build a career that gives you more and more of what you expect. But for the person who's making the work, that can kind of be deadly.

Andrew Huberman: Did you know Jean-Michel Basquiat?

Twyla Tharp: No.

Andrew Huberman: Okay.

Twyla Tharp: A different generation. I knew the painters, the downtown painters in the '60s.

Andrew Huberman: Could you give me some examples of...

Twyla Tharp: Oh, you want to know the famous names on TV.

Andrew Huberman: No, I don't want to know the names, I just have a question about-

Twyla Tharp: Tony Smith, Frank Stella, Motherwell, Ad Reinhardt.

Andrew Huberman: Great.

Andrew Huberman: Okay. The reason I ask is that earlier you were saying that there's a time or there was a time, when in a given field, everyone knew each other and what they were doing. And I like Basquiat. I'm not obsessed with him or anything. There's a wonderful scene in the movie, "Basquiat," with him and Benicio del Toro, or the actor playing him and Benicio del Toro, about this notion of fame. We'll put a link to it in the caption so people can see it.

Andrew Huberman: And it's just a wonderful example of how people will love you, then they'll hate you for how you change, then they'll love you for how you were. And it's hilarious, and again, for a consumer of content, it's perhaps even more interesting than somebody who's a creative.

Andrew Huberman: But the point being that nowadays I feel like there's so much stuff out there. Art and music, and dance, and Instagram puts it all on smorgasbord display for us. And it's kind of harder to know where one sits in a community of creators. And so, to what extent do you think that being surrounded by other creators, like visual artists or other dancers, then versus now was or is useful?

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. The early era, also age, is a factor here. I was very young. I was just out of college. And I felt very much the student. It's a different deal now, and it's a different kind of responsibility, and the work's going to be different. In the early era, I went to see absolutely everything. Now I go to see absolutely nothing.

Twyla Tharp: And it is partially a matter of time, but more importantly, it's an awareness that you want to feel isolated in a way because you are, and that's the truth. So you need to operate from a truthful place.

Twyla Tharp: And when you talk about this plethora of information that is out there. I do try to inform myself to some degree about different areas of culture, but I do it through a media perspective because that's how the consumer is receiving it. Consumer is not at the individual exhibition or at the individual performance. They're getting it through media.

Twyla Tharp: So, in looking at it through media, I already have a double perspective on it. I have the artist's perspective, but I have the journalist's, for lack of a better word, we'll call it podcasting journalism. Will we be forgiven?

Andrew Huberman: Sure.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: Podcasting's a weird thing we could talk about later, what it is and what it isn't, but yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Okay. We'll wait till this is off to discuss that, right?

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Sure.

Twyla Tharp: But the challenge for me becomes, okay, in all of this swirl of stuff, what do you believe?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Forget who, you can't believe anyone, but what? What can you believe? What is really grounded in a way that's productive? I've just come off, if you'll forgive me for diverging here for a moment, two really hard years of working.

Twyla Tharp: A 60th anniversary tour that was a very big culmination of a long, long working process, which put a lot on the line, and which was unfortunately very successful because success is much harder to follow than failure. So here you sit, "Okay, babe, you've done it all. Now what?" And so, where do you go?

Twyla Tharp: And you don't go around asking other people for the answer to your question. One has to find a way of rerouting without abandoning who you are and what you believe in order to just make change, really? How does that work? So it's an extremely attenuated place to be.

Twyla Tharp: Not many people make it this far. Not many people are looking at their 61st year of work, right? So, that's like, okay, so show us. Well, maybe I don't want to. Maybe I will. Who knows?

Andrew Huberman: You said that coming off of a success is much more challenging than coming off of a failure. I think that will surprise a number of people because people, myself included, probably feel like when you do well, you get the confidence that you can do well again. There's that also. Whereas when you fail, you're like, "Ugh."

Twyla Tharp: You can do that again too.

Andrew Huberman: Do you tell your dancers that?

Twyla Tharp: No, because my dancers don't fail.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm.

Twyla Tharp: That's why I work with dancers who want to work as hard as I do.

Andrew Huberman: Let's talk more about that process.

Twyla Tharp: Yep.

Andrew Huberman: In your book you talked about failure being critical, failing a lot, a lot in private.

Twyla Tharp: Yep.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: That had a big impact on me.

Twyla Tharp: Uh-huh.

Andrew Huberman: I think that this notion of making lots and lots of failures and mistakes privately...

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. When you're working, you don't know if it's a failure or not. You only know if it's useful. You know if it's exciting. You know if it generates a next question. That's useful. You don't know if it's good or bad.

Andrew Huberman: Let's go back to your dancers and how you put them through the paces, so to speak. Because I think it also frames up this notion of rituals very nicely. For the uninformed, like myself, give us an example of your day and a day in the studio, the top contour of that.

Twyla Tharp: It depends on where you are in this wonderful word called 'process.' If you are at the beginning, it's all more fluid. And while the one key ingredient I have always found to doing work is you got to be able to do a schedule. You've got to be able to tell people what time they're coming and what shoes to bring. Okay? That's already actually made a lot of choices for you.

Twyla Tharp: And that, I think, is a good thing. I mean, there's no point in just saying, "Oh, we'll work whenever you get here," and "Bring whatever." 'Whatever' is not my favorite word. So choices get made, and a schedule gets done.

Twyla Tharp: And ordinarily, again, it depends on what the project is, but let's just give as much range here as possible, if it's me making a new piece, I will set a schedule. Dancers come in. They will have done class themselves. They will come warm, okay? That is not a part of my day.

Twyla Tharp: I have my own work to do in preparing for that rehearsal, but in also maintaining my own physical instrument to the degree that I can. Because the more I can bring into the studio, the more I can give them, and the more I can expect them to bring in.

Twyla Tharp: So, I have a tandem path going on here with the dancers, and we meet up, we join, and I usually will come with a certain preset sense of where we're going with this thing, and then see how it actually works in real time, in real space, which is a very useful and tough mistress and eliminates a lot of fantasy very quickly.

Andrew Huberman: Who decides who gets to work with you?

Twyla Tharp: I do. Well, that's actually not true. In a way, they do. The dancers that I work with, I obviously audition, but I also screen from the perspective of, who wants to work with me?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Who's going to come and say, "Yeah, I'll go through that wall. Is that what we're doing? I'll go through the wall." And you want to know that you have that in the room. You're not going to ask them to go through the wall all the time, but if it seemed like it was an approach that was going to be useful, you've got to know that that commitment is really solid. And that's best indicated by their desire. Not your finding them totally appropriate, but their desire.

Andrew Huberman: Are most dancers living with the understanding that it's going to be very, very long hours and probably very little pay for a while?

Twyla Tharp: For sure very little pay, and forever.

Andrew Huberman: Wild world.

Twyla Tharp: Crazy. Crazy, and to my way of thinking, not acceptable. Because I'm all in favor of the folks who do the work and the training to accomplish physically, and I don't make a clear distinction between either folks who are in business or athletes. To me, it is all the same enterprise. But dancers have nowhere near the possibility of earning a living that a great athlete has. Not even sort of, kind of in the ballpark. Not even in the parking lot. Not even on the highway to the ballgame.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: How did this happen, and why does it continue?

Andrew Huberman: It raises interesting questions at how we support the arts or don't support the arts, I think.

Twyla Tharp: Are we taking over your show for the next two and a half years?

Andrew Huberman: If we must.

Twyla Tharp: Oh, okay.

Andrew Huberman: This conversation, no doubt, will draw some additional attention to dance, but the larger issue of people being able to make it in the arts, not just as a luxury, but as a critical piece of culture and life. I mean, I love beautiful things. I love beautiful dogs. Most all dogs are beautiful, even the bulldogs. But I love beautiful things, and it enriches life in more ways than just feeling delighted.

Andrew Huberman: I think there's immense carryover from the arts to other areas of culture, and so we could make an economic argument about that. But it's part of the reason you're here. But to just sort of return to this business of ritual. Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Can I interrupt you before you go there?

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Because I'd like to take up two things.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: One is the notion of the reality being that when we do a successful performance, I measure it by, did that audience leave in a better frame of mind than it came in with? In other words, we provide a service.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And we provide a service that gives them a sense of optimism. Yeah, verily, I might even go to joy, to the belief that they too occupy this body that does these phenomenal things, and thank you, Lord.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Okay? That's a service.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: I think dancers should be paid more for that service, and that it needs to be acknowledged. The other point that I want to bring up is... You've used it twice now. I didn't stop you the first word. Beauty. What is this?

Andrew Huberman: It could be something I see or hear that it stirs up some set of emotions in me that carries forward. And what you just said a moment ago about the audience leaves in a different state, I mean, the word that came to mind was it's really great therapy.

Andrew Huberman: But in some sense, it's better than that because... I was also thinking that perhaps in the top 10 of all my favorite memories are several live performances in which I was the observer. It's like those things really stick with us, and I think they change us in meaningful ways, especially when we're in the audience with other people, not just watching on a screen. They can be transformative, for sure.

Twyla Tharp: And in a live audience becomes, of course, a whole other thing about cost and expenditures, but that it confirms that not only do you feel a new righteousness for yourself by a performance, but that you sense others do as well, and that creates a community bonding. And, okay, football games, everybody is very rowdy about it. Most performances, people are not, but that doesn't mean that it still doesn't take that hold of people who are experiencing the same thing in real time. We tend to dismiss that which is familiar.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And that sense is actually not all that familiar, but it feels very intimate, and it is. But it actually is quite rare. And the rarer a piece of art, and I will call a performance a piece of art, is, the more value it has, and the more that is compensated for culturally and economically. There should be a price point on beauty, let's put it that way.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Andrew Huberman: Well, there is for everything else.

Twyla Tharp: Well, I know.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. There is a price point for beauty in terms of... People could say, "Well, the sunrise is free," and the sunrise is beautiful, but seeing it in certain locations costs a lot more money than seeing it in other locations. That's for sure.

Twyla Tharp: Right. And that brings up another thing because in a way, it's a kind of horrible thinking to go, "Yeah, it's a privilege. You know what? You can't pay me. You can't buy me. I don't have a price."

Twyla Tharp: And that, I'm sure, is one of the things in great dancers who are certainly not paid, as I've said before, and I'll say at least 300,000 times more, commensurate with a great athlete, that is probably one... I've never brought it up directly with a great dancer. How much is it your own sense of independence and liberty that makes you the artist that you are?

Andrew Huberman: I think the name that most people probably associate with dance is probably Baryshnikov. If they don't know much about dance, they know that name, or it's familiar to them. What was it about Mikhail Baryshnikov that sort of had him break through the common consciousness that way?

Twyla Tharp: First of all, Misha more these days, actually, is remembered by younger generations from his later cultural input, i.e., "Sex and the City," than he is as a classical ballet artist, all right? Let's just start there.

Andrew Huberman: Because he showed up in "Sex and the City" as a character.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: Show business is a funny thing.

Twyla Tharp: And that's how he is often recognized by younger audiences, younger folk. What was he? In the beginning, he was... Actually, there was a cellist, then there was Nureyev, and then Misha. Politically, he came across a line. It was Russia, America. He chose America. He's our hero. Plus which, he was gorgeous.

Twyla Tharp: He's unquestionably, in my opinion, in that era, the possessor of a technique that was a culmination of the 20th century and that will never be matched. And to see him work at the barre or to see him in the absolute interior realm of what the classical ballet was, was an unbelievable privilege.

Twyla Tharp: But not many people saw that. Not many people saw him at the barre, which is where you build your chops, okay? He also was capable of taking those chops and expanding on them, breaking through their boundaries, trying it this way, do it that way, but utilizing the power that he had from that simple classical base to take it outward. Lots of inventiveness in that regard. And the guy was gorgeous. What can I tell you?

Andrew Huberman: His looks made a difference.

Twyla Tharp: And what does that mean? But what does that mean? It means a wide-ranging interest that you feel includes you, as you the spectator. You feel he's including you in his wideness of vision. Where does that come from? From the intellect, from his musicality, from his training, from his personality, from his cultural breeding, Latvian.

Twyla Tharp: And it is a singular commodification, one of my favorite words that drives people up the walls when I use that word in relation to the arts of performing. But he was very, very, very astute in many different areas, starting from an athletic ability through to a poetic sensibility.

Andrew Huberman: It's interesting you said that because he was attractive, that people felt that they were a part of it in a way that was not typical.

Twyla Tharp: We all want to be godly. We all want to be a part of the sublime. Few can give us that.

Andrew Huberman: So when they say artists, I include dancers, I'm just broadly speaking, artists are like portals. Is that what you mean?

Twyla Tharp: I would accept that.

Andrew Huberman: Years ago, I went to a Philip Glass concert at UC Berkeley. I'll be honest, I didn't understand it. I left there in a different state, mostly of confusion that people were willing to pay for that. I'm sorry if I'm insulting any Philip Glass fans, but this is my podcast. I'm going to be very direct.

Twyla Tharp: Okay.

Andrew Huberman: I was told I maybe hadn't seen the right Philip Glass concert. I was very confused.

Twyla Tharp: Why?

Andrew Huberman: I'm not a musician. But when I like something, I know I like it, and I tend to really like it. But it's rare for me to encounter something that's like... It felt extremely experimental at every part of it. And I couldn't tell whether or not people were telling themselves that they liked it because it was him, or whether they really liked it.

Twyla Tharp: What year is this that you went to this concert?

Andrew Huberman: Gosh, this must've been 2008, 2007, 2008.

Twyla Tharp: Oh.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Okay.

Twyla Tharp: That's very late. Okay?

Twyla Tharp: So Phil obviously has been working since the '60s. And I've done one major collaboration with Phil and one recent collaboration. And in the beginning, the audience for minimalism, right, Reich, Riley, Glass came gradually.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And so when the initial piece, called "In the Upper Room," was done, it had a power and a force that involved also discovery. Now, the later piece, which is called "Slacktide," Phil's a known commodity, and was addressed slightly differently, rather than, I mean, Phil, "ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba, yep, ba ba ba ba ba, bee, ba ba, ba ba ba."

Twyla Tharp: It's percussive. The lyric element has been reduced, okay? And you're a sensitive soul. You think of the word beauty, and that does not mean total elimination. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. It means inclusion.

Twyla Tharp: And so the later Glass work was done in conjunction with a Chicago percussion group called Third Coast, who Phil has worked with a lot and who he trusts to do iterations, if you will, on the work. And we iterated with a flute. Flutes don't do this.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Flutes do this. So, we put a stream on top of that. That's in the music. I mean, iterations are a study in and of themselves, right? What makes something different from and yet still the same as? Good luck with that one. But that was the different range.

Twyla Tharp: I dare say if you go and look at, because Third Coast has produced a recording of this work, you listen to "Slacktide" and then tell me your response to Glass. But basically, minimalism took the lyric element and reduced it to just the temporal passage and time.

Andrew Huberman: What's interesting, because of all the concerts I've seen, this one still sticks with me as a stimulus to learn more. Because one thing that I'm totally fascinated by and perplexed by is that with the exception of comedy, the more one learns about something, the artist, what went into the art, the dance, what went into it, typically, the more one likes that piece or that genre. The more I learn about something, then I can listen to it with a different ear.

Andrew Huberman: I can watch it with a different eye. Comedy's the exception. If it's not funny, learning about the origins of the joke don't make it any funnier. Learning about the comedian doesn't make it funnier. It sort of just falls further and further.

Twyla Tharp: See, I think that's true of your other art forms, too. I think you're confusing, forgive me, knowledge with instinct. I mean, instinctively, you're responding to the humor, but instinctively, a piece of art can reach you, but you can be baffled by it. But we don't like confusion, so we might call that something we should learn about before we can acknowledge liking it.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: That's one of the things that is, I think, really difficult and something I think a lot about, which is not only protecting, but refining instinct.

Andrew Huberman: Tell me more about that. Taste-

Twyla Tharp: I know. It's fascinating, isn't it? I can't tell you about it because I could be writing a book.

Andrew Huberman: Oh. Well, Rick Rubin, who I feel, even though you haven't met yet, you share a certain kinship with, talks about taste all the time, about this sense of taste, and trusting your own sense of taste as a consumer and as a creator is so key.

Twyla Tharp: Right.

Twyla Tharp: Right.

Andrew Huberman: That's why I brought up the Philip Glass thing, because I'm not writing off Glass on the basis of one concert. But I didn't walk out of there thinking "Maybe I'm an idiot. Maybe I didn't get it." And I didn't think, "They're all idiots." I just thought, "I guess I'm just different, because everyone else here seems to really love this, and this just doesn't hit me right." It's like, I don't like sardines. Never liked sardines.

Andrew Huberman: You give me 100 sardines, I'm going to hate them 100 times more than the first sardine, I promise, because I've eaten 100 sardines. But I don't care that I don't like sardines. I'm over it. I was over it from the first sardine.

Twyla Tharp: Right. Phil's on the cusp of the avant-garde. The avant-garde is a smug place to be, and can be very aggravating, and can also be not that bright, and very indulgent. There might have been some sense of that to it. The avant-garde can confuse itself with originality and vice versa.

Andrew Huberman: Do you think it's important for dancers to be classically trained before they get into other forms?

Twyla Tharp: To be classically trained, absolutely. You want to be a musician and not understand the circle of fifths, the harmonies of construction of all music? No. Ballet is a format for the human body moving in space that has evolved over many centuries and has got a head start on us. And if you want to learn about how you move, you might as well try and jump a little further forward by studying ballet.

Twyla Tharp: I don't care, ultimately, if your arabesque, which is one leg behind, one leg under, right? If your arabesque is aligned in a perfectly classical manner, unless it's a perfectly classical ballet. But I do care you have that gear, and you can reference it in terms of where's the leg going to move from and does it get to that point. Can it stop right on its center or not? That's what ballet can do.

Andrew Huberman: If there's a proper way for a movement to be done, the limb, every element within the limb has to move from point A to point B in a certain trajectory, and people come in different sizes and shapes, and you've got multiple dancers on stage. How do you reconcile that?

Twyla Tharp: You don't. And the word is 'properly.' Properly. What is proper? I had the experience of working with the Kirov in St. Petersburg, and I went to their school.

Twyla Tharp: And the children are lined up, and they are exact replicas, and they have a huge selection mechanism throughout the country for picking those 10 or 12 kids that are going to be in there, of whatever age.

Twyla Tharp: And I saw one group of little boys, less than eight years old. There were probably eight or nine of them in their little black shorts, their little white shirts. And I just came in briefly, and they were being, as they do... It's a part of the tradition, and it's wonderful. They're being very respectful, and it was like, "Oh, come in, and you will sit here, and they will continue, and then we're getting moved to the next class."

Twyla Tharp: And one little boy came out and said, "No, no, no, we want to do more." So we went back, and they started jumping out of sequence because a ballet class is very carefully constructed to warm up the body and also to develop the training, so you're working both laterally and in depth in every technique class.

Twyla Tharp: They went out of sequence so the boys could jump, which is usually not done till the very end of class. And this little guy had real what we call ballon. He could go up, and he could, for moments, it seems like he's able to suspend. He knew he had that.

Andrew Huberman: He could fly.

Twyla Tharp: And he knew I wouldn't see that at the barre so he wanted to..

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: But he was what we call pronated. His feet were hyperextended to the outside, so he's not going straight up through the metatarsal. He's going up through the outside of the leg. And I pulled the teacher out, and I said, "You know, that kid's phenomenally talented." And he said, "Yeah, we know." And I said, "But he's pronating." He said, "We know that too, but we have eight other ones. If he doesn't figure that out, he's out, and we'll bring in another one."

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Andrew Huberman: Ooh.

Twyla Tharp: And this can be the difference between a child who grows into an adult with a career and a life, and one who's lost. So parents are very protective of trying to get this opportunity for their kids, and it's heartbreaking. And the way they are trained is they are wrenched into these positions. And I saw, in an older class of young girls, an arabesque, and one leg was not slightly behind.

Twyla Tharp: The teacher came and literally pinned the leg behind with one arm and drew the shoulder out this way, literally pushed her, and then released her, and that's how they teach. You think that's going to happen in America? I don't think so. And that's what it takes to create a line of people who, at the barre, hit exactly the same arabesque.

Twyla Tharp: It's both a thing of extraordinary beauty and a thing of incredible lack of choice because that arabesque is going to be set for life in that one angular demarcation, right? And heaven knows here in the West, we like to encourage all kinds of wanderings around, which is hard to get through the head of a child who's been trained in this way to stay within those parameters. And it says something also, obviously, about the political situation, right? Those kids don't have a lot of choice. They toe the line.

Andrew Huberman: So, is the goal to get that uniformity?

Twyla Tharp: Absolutely. I mean, for a person who works sometimes to what's called unison, there are times when you want... I don't do it that often. It's a lot of work, and I don't like what it says about democracy. But if you need to have unison, you want unison, and that means an exact agreement on time and space.

Twyla Tharp: Now, your other question about what about different body types and so forth, I can accommodate that because I can gain my unison from the center. What we're talking about at the ballet here, it gains it from the periphery, from the exterior point, from the broad reach. I'll accept my broad reach is not going to be actually in uniform, but my center is going to be.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And I'll make that compromise. It's a compromise of sorts. It's not really a compromise, it's an agreement. I'll make that definition because I want them to work from an interior purpose, and the visuals of it are your problem.

Andrew Huberman: By now, I'm sure that many of you have heard me say that I've been taking AG1 for more than a decade, and indeed, that's true. The reason I started taking AG1 way back in 2012, and the reason why I still continue to take it every single day, is because AG1 is, to my knowledge, the highest quality and most comprehensive of the foundational nutritional supplements on the market.

Andrew Huberman: What that means is that it contains not just vitamins and minerals, but also probiotics, prebiotics, and adaptogens to cover any gaps that you might have in your diet while also providing support for a demanding life. Given the probiotics and prebiotics in AG1, it also helps support a healthy gut microbiome. The gut microbiome consists of trillions of little microorganisms that line your digestive tract and impact things such as your immune status, your metabolic health, your hormone health, and much more.

Andrew Huberman: Taking AG1 consistently helps my digestion, keeps my immune system strong, and it ensures that my mood and mental focus are always at their best. AG1 is now available in three new flavors: berry, citrus, and tropical. And while I've always loved the AG1 original flavor, especially with a bit of lemon juice added, I'm really enjoying the new berry flavor in particular. It tastes great, but then again, I do love all the flavors.

Andrew Huberman: If you'd like to try AG1 and try these new flavors, you can go to drinkag1.com/huberman to claim a special offer. Just go to drinkag1.com/huberman to get started.

Andrew Huberman: I'm going to ask a couple of questions in the frame of biology that I think, I'm hoping you might find interesting, but you certainly have the information that I'm seeking here.

Twyla Tharp: Okay.

Andrew Huberman: First off, you may know this, but if you don't, there's a great Nobel Prize-winning physiologist, his name was Sherrington, and he said, "The final common path is movement." That basically, the movement of an organism, especially mammals, is really what the nervous system is constructed for.

Andrew Huberman: And more modern theories are that movement came, then dance came, then song, then language. But that movement is the foundation of everything as it relates to evolution of a species, finding mates, finding food.

Twyla Tharp: Can I interrupt you?

Andrew Huberman: Please.

Twyla Tharp: It is even more basic because movement is the first thing we're going to do, and you don't make any sound until you can move parts of you.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: You don't feed yourself until you can move that hand. You don't write anything, language, music, or nada, without movement. Why do we therefore stick movement way down here under the bottom of our cultural heap as somehow shameful or what? What is it with the aspect of dance that makes it a less kind of revered format than sculpture or painting, or music? A secondary handmaiden to the arts, really?

Andrew Huberman: Well, I certainly appreciate movement, and I know that... And I like to think that people's obsession with athleticism in some sense reflects that, too.

Twyla Tharp: Totally.

Andrew Huberman: I've been wanting to ask you this question for a very long time since I heard your book, even though it's not about the creative process, and here goes. I'm going to keep this as brief as possible just to give the raw materials for your response.

Andrew Huberman: So, the motor neurons, the neurons that control movement, they control movement of the trunk, they control movement of the fine digits of the fingers, that are the fingers, the digits, as we call them in science, right, nerdspeak, the wrists, everything. So we say from proximal to distal, like from center out.

Andrew Huberman: There's this incredible thing that's been discovered over the last 20 years or so, which is that the molecular identities of the neurons that control the movement of my trunk and your trunk forward and back and side to side are exactly the same as the neurons that control undulation in a fish.

Andrew Huberman: The neurons that control the movement of the proximal limbs, like the upper arms and the thighs, are molecularly identical to the neurons that exist to control fin movement in fish. And that what evolved was progressively more and more motor neurons so that we, as old world primates, can manipulate the fine digits like so.

Andrew Huberman: Okay, so that's fine. That just tells you that there's this kind of primitive to more evolved structure of neurons that control movement from center out. What's fascinating to me is that while I'm sure there are people who can move their trunk at very high frequency, undulate at high frequency, that's a hard thing to do. That generally has to be learned. Like I can move my trunk slowly from side to side, but it's hard to move it very fast from side to side, but I can move my fingers very fast.

Andrew Huberman: And so there's basically a frequency map from the center out on the body. So now when I look at the way people move, I think, because I'm a neuroscientist and I have this knowledge in my head, they're communicating frequency, and frequency in photon space gives you a very interesting... We have wavelength, we have also frequency.

Andrew Huberman: In sound, you have low and high pitches, low to high pitch, and in other domains, you also have this. And so, to me first of all, I'd love your thoughts on this. I'm not asking for validation of a theory. This just is what it is. I didn't come up with this.

Andrew Huberman: But I wonder whether or not, consciously or unconsciously, when you've choreographed dance, whether or not you're making music with movement in a way that maps onto this idea of a frequency map from center out. Maybe? In part? No?

Twyla Tharp: Sweetness, my love. Did we not discuss already much earlier the importance and specificity of center? Now, what you're saying about the different rates of the tendrils, the neurons, the cellular, macular...

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, the...

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, the neurons that control the trunk versus the upper arms versus the digits.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. This has got more choice, can make more choice than this can make.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Do I think about the parts of the body as... Sometimes. In other words, the legs can be working at one rate of speed, say halftime of what the arm is doing, and they'll be on the same metronomic base, but they'll be operating at a different speed. Certainly, I would think of that.

Twyla Tharp: What I think about power, that sometimes, you can isolate through the center, and there'll be a huge impact from the top, but that the lower body will be fluid. Sometimes. I mean, I've ripped off Tai chi forever, it's okay. So we're doing Tai chi, and suddenly... And then we're back into it, right? So, it's just a jolt that goes through it, and I suppose that's a change in your neurological construct.

Twyla Tharp: I mean, what interests me in what you're saying is a part of the nightmare of my life, which is dance has difficulty, and one of the reasons it has difficulty in being registered by many people in our culture, is that it doesn't have easy access to being documented and recorded in the way that music does or language does.

Twyla Tharp: What you're saying, I've argued for many years, should be a way of documenting movement that people could read, and then they could read a dance, and then they would feel grounded in that tradition and understanding of that tradition. They could study that tradition. That's not now possible.

Andrew Huberman: I'd like to talk about the creative process a bit, in a way that perhaps people can structure some of their own creative pursuits. At what point do you know the spine?

Twyla Tharp: The beginning and the end.

Andrew Huberman: Okay.

Twyla Tharp: Okay, what do I mean? In the beginning, you hope for it. And you have a little taste of it, or you wouldn't be able to... I wouldn't be able to start without the tiniest little indication there's something there that's actually going to hook it, and that's going to allow me to start building. And this is where the process becomes very reassuring. You start building the wall. You're just mixing the mortar and putting the brick in mixing the mortar and putting the bits...

Twyla Tharp: And the wall grows, and it develops all of this stuff happening, and you're just doing the mortar and the brick. And it's very not menacing and extraordinarily rewarding, and the place you want to live. But you can't, because you got to finish the work and let it go. A dismal moment.

Andrew Huberman: Maybe we put this into example. Let's say, I want to write a short story. I realize you're a choreographer, not a writing instructor, but we'd say like, what's the... And then you say, well someone says, they want to write stories or books. "So, what's the spine?" Right?

Twyla Tharp: Well, the first thing is: What's the idea? The first thing is where's the story?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: I mean, some writers have to know the end before they can start at the beginning. Others want nothing to do with the end until they've at least reached the middle, because they want the work to find itself. That's a part of the privilege of being a writer and the pain of being a writer.

Twyla Tharp: But the construct of starting, sometimes it's simply habit and discipline. And you are going to go in, and you are going to start at, let's say, 6:45 every morning, and you're going to give yourself... You've only got an hour and a half, okay? I'm not talking about you're a professional writer.

Twyla Tharp: I'm talking about you're a person who maybe wants to become a professional writer, but who's got at least one other job and maybe two and probably a kid to deal with. An hour and a half is a lot of time in that life.

Twyla Tharp: So starting, you got to start with something, and either there's an idea that you really are energized by, or you start writing something, get something on the page, and bit by bit it becomes a habit. And maybe that habit evolves, and maybe it doesn't, and maybe you give it up, and maybe you find that you... Then you get an idea. You find something you keep returning to, and it pulls you. It hypnotizes you. It makes you want to follow it, see where it will go to, see how it will develop. And then at a certain point, it's done. It's played out.

Twyla Tharp: Maybe you can guide that so that it becomes more exciting, and you learn how to build as you're going along, and you learn how to direct it so that it's going to get to either a surprising end, where it has to end, and the reader's going to say, "I should have seen that," or you're going to say, "I should have seen that," or you're going to go, "No way. You're a liar. I'm not going to buy this book."

Andrew Huberman: But the showing up at 6:45 consistently is the bricklaying that's essential.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, because it allows you to think that you could be a writer.

Andrew Huberman: Sort of living into a delusion that could be a reality.

Twyla Tharp: Could be.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: And maybe it's not a delusion, because maybe what you start to write immediately is a very interesting sentence or two.

Andrew Huberman: Some days. Maybe it...

Twyla Tharp: Some days. Yeah, you can't expect a good time every day. You might want to quote me on that.

Andrew Huberman: You have a reputation for having risen early and gotten to the gym by 5:00 AM for two hours, eating three hard-boiled eggs post-workout, day in after day out for a very long time. Tell us about that ritual, and do you still enjoy it?

Twyla Tharp: It's not a ritual, and I never enjoyed it. It's a reality. And you do it because you need an instrument that you can challenge. And in order to challenge something, you got to know how it stands. I mean, I could challenge, you wouldn't want me to, the centering of this. But I can only do it if it's already grounded, then I can try to throw it off. You can't just throw things off. They got to be set before you can throw them off, right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: So that is, you just set the mechanism for the day, you're going to have to do it. It's kind of boring, and it's kind of loathsome. I would rather go to the gym than brush my teeth, I'll tell you that.

Andrew Huberman: Could you give us a bit of insight into your inner dialogue around days when you don't want to go? Is there a self-talk, or have you learned to push aside the voice that says, "Maybe not today?"

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. No, it's simple. If you don't work when you don't want to work, you're not going to be able to work when you do want to work. End of story.

Andrew Huberman: Were you always like this?

Twyla Tharp: What do you mean, like this?

Andrew Huberman: I didn't mean that in that sense and you know I didn't.

Twyla Tharp: You did.

Twyla Tharp: I don't.

Andrew Huberman: You know I didn't.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, I don't.

Andrew Huberman: You know I didn't. I meant, have you always been this disciplined and had this clear view of the necessity for hard work?

Twyla Tharp: My mother was an extraordinary force in anybody's life. She happened to be in mine, okay? I was trained as a very young child to practice, whether... Anything, everything had to be practiced, and it had to be scheduled to be practiced. And time is limited, and you don't waste it.

Twyla Tharp: And you work very hard, and you try to maximize that period of time, because otherwise you're being wasteful. And while I said I'm from San Berdu, I am, but I'm not. I am from the Midwest. I was born in Indiana, and left when I was eight. But up until that point, I had the extraordinary good fortune of being on my grandparents' farm for long stretches of time without my parents. And these farms were in Amish territory, and the family's Quaker. And the land was the land, period. There was no electricity. There were no phones. There was plant the seed, grow the seed, kill the hogs, wring the chicken's neck, and you work, or you don't eat.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, the Midwest sensibility is something to behold. I have a lot of friends in the Midwest. There's a real decency out there in terms of how people communicate with one another, they do and don't know, and there's a real thing to farmers.

Twyla Tharp: Yup.

Andrew Huberman: At Stanford, when I was a postdoc, there was a MD-PhD student in the laboratory. She'd grown up on a mushroom farm, not the psilocybin mushrooms, the kind you eat and don't hallucinate, on a mushroom farm in rural Pennsylvania.

Twyla Tharp: Oh.

Andrew Huberman: And her work ethic, and this is at Stanford School of Medicine, where people are very driven, not just on average.

Twyla Tharp: Right. Yeah, yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Her work ethic was unbelievable.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: And her cheerfulness about it was also unbelievable.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: It was spectacular.

Twyla Tharp: The delight, in fact.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. She had a bike accident on... A few people will know who this is.

Twyla Tharp: Uh-oh.

Andrew Huberman: She had a horrible bike accident on campus, knocked out all her teeth. Someone had stepped out in front of her at the... She was back in the laboratory with falsies in, and working, I think, within 48 hours. This would've put anyone else out for a much longer time.

Twyla Tharp: Holy shit.

Andrew Huberman: I haven't kept up with her, but I'm sure that she's a spectacular physician, scientist, wherever she is. But there's really something to the farming piece.

Twyla Tharp: It is communal, and it is the sense that while these farms are very isolated, I mean, 100-acre plots that are divided by tree barriers from one another, that somebody has your back all the time. I still have my grandmother's quilting frames. And when established, it require eight women, four or two to a side, and the quilt gets done, and then you make eight of them, and each one gets a quilt.

Twyla Tharp: And you know that to do the big job, the barn that's got to get up, you have to utilize forces outside yourself, in order to accomplish this, and that you owe them. And you want to. It's not an obligation. It's a sharing. And you understand, "Okay, I'm getting that barn. I owe services here for seven more barns or whatever." This is an excellent thing. And I do try to think of dance that way, and I do think a well-made dance is a good community.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm.

Twyla Tharp: It's society as it ought to be. It works the way we should work together.

Andrew Huberman: You mentioned Quaker.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: I've been to a couple Quaker meetings.

Twyla Tharp: Silent meetings?

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. Every once in a while, someone would stand up and say something. I had a friend who was a... There's a Quaker house near where I used to live when I was finishing my master's, and I became friendly with a guy outside because we would drink coffee at the same coffee shop and chat, and he was like, "You should come to a meeting. You might find it interesting." And I knew I was in a benevolent place when I walked in, because in Berkeley, California, if somebody says, "Hey, you should come to a meeting and you're like, you don't know what you're getting into, right?

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: But they had a picture of the Quaker Oats. A guy on the wall as a joke. I knew, I'm like, "Okay, they can poke some fun at themselves."

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: So yeah, someone would stand up every once in a while, say something, there was some reflection, and then at the end, everyone kind of like said goodbye, and the coffee was... It was interesting.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, in those days, for me, were Wednesday evenings, and they were silent meetings. And there would be meetings where no one had anything to say. They were silent meetings. And simply, you can help me out here. They were not using language, but surely neural rays were going out.

Twyla Tharp: And probably if there'd been a catastrophe in the culture, some kind of huge fire or something awful, you know that people are thinking. You have a sense of what that thinking is, and that there was, and is, and can be a kind of non-verbal communication that's not even a physical... You're not using sign language to communicate. But that you have a sense of what we called in the day, in the air.

Twyla Tharp: In the air. And that is a very powerful form of communication that we don't really respect anymore. And how potent is it neurologically?

Andrew Huberman: This last year, the podcast series, "Telepathy Tapes," was very, very popular. I haven't had a chance to watch it in full. I listened to a little bit of it. It's about how kids who are non-verbal perhaps can tap into this. And it's gotten some criticism from the standard scientific community, but also less than you would've anticipated if it had all been complete BS. So, I think it's gotten partial acceptance there.

Andrew Huberman: This brings us back to the notion of a center, believe it or not. Fish have lateral lines. They sense the electrical fields of other fish and other things near them. I mean, there's many, many examples from the animal kingdom of the Platypus with its electric... People call it an electric sensing bill, but it sends out these electrical fields that then it can detect things in its environment, because its vision is very poor.

Twyla Tharp: Mm.

Andrew Huberman: Somebody once said, Ed Yong, the writer, said, that so many animals rely on smell. We sort of smell with our eyes, which sounds crazy, but we use our eyes the way that other animals use their noses, and that gives you an insight into how they use their noses. But most animals have a sense of how close or far other members of their species and other things are.

Andrew Huberman: We tend not to think about that, unless you live in a big open space and you get on the New York Subway and suddenly you're like, "Whoa, this is different." But we have these. We don't really have a lateral line, but we have remnants of things that are similar. There are beautiful studies showing that if you look for, in an experimental context, magnetoreception in the human brain, people perform above chance. In other words, we can detect magnetic fields. People are going to think I'm crazy, but this is published in Science Magazine.

Twyla Tharp: Oh, no. No.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. We can sense electric fields, but we sort of have to train ourselves to do it, and perhaps some people are just naturally leaning that way. So, when I say energetic, neural communication across space that isn't just words, sounds, sound waves, and vision, photons. So, there's stuff happening at a distance. And smell, I think we vastly underestimate the extent to which pheromones and odors of people who are upset, or you know... There's studies showing that human tears affect hormones in people around them.

Twyla Tharp: You need to have a 16-year-old boy around you when it comes to the sensitivity to smell and perfumes being sold commercially these days.

Andrew Huberman: Oh my goodness.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. But the thing about distance is something that I'm very, very interested in. I mean, the awareness is mostly visual for dancers, and it's usually established, again, in class. If you have a crowded class, the distance can be, ooh, the next one would be out here from this point.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: But a really crowded class, the distance might be out here, in which case you're going to be angling yourself to the diagonal, so you're able to get full reach, which is going to impact on design, right? But there are also ways, and it's very demanding, actually, and it requires a lot of trust on everybody's part, where I can get dancers to work very close together.

Twyla Tharp: And that has a real visual impact, and it becomes a physical sensation of the person watching. It can become an anxiety, "Oh, don't step on the... She's going to get stepped on." And there I'm kind of using it crassly. But it's interesting to push people into what's called one another's space, and be able to condense the amount of area that people feel comfortable in or require, which could be a very good thing, culturally speaking, because we got less and less space.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, it's interesting that this notion of communication across space, if we could just continue down this path a bit. Last year, I had the great honor, really, to do a lecture about music and the brain with Renée Fleming, the great opera singer. And we got onto this topic of the fact that the opera singers will capture an emotion.

Andrew Huberman: They're using their diaphragm in a very particular way, getting a certain frequency of vibration in their body, obviously using air, shaping the air as it leaves their lungs to sing.

Andrew Huberman: And how maybe that's actually impacting the same sets of neurons in the audience, but they're not singing. Okay, this is kind of an interesting idea that you're feeling the emotion of the singer because your phrenic nerve, the nerve that controls the diaphragm, it might be vibrating at a similar frequency.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, absolutely.

Andrew Huberman: This sort of gets back to this, like more, I don't want to call them primitive, but more fundamental aspects of language and communication.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: I wonder with dance, and perhaps with athleticism too, like on a football field, when we see somebody move or people move in a certain way, whether or not we don't realize it, perhaps, but that there's almost the illusion that we're moving like that.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: We're accessing this idea of portals, art as portals, that we're actually sensing at some level what it would be like to move like that, and of course, I can't.

Twyla Tharp: Absolutely. I mean, you know these ocular glasses, right? That you believe that you're projecting yourself into that item up there and actually feeling it. Hello. Right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: That must be what is working, what's creating that illusion. You're not really inside that item, but you feel and believe as though you are.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, I've done a VR where you think you're in a different body. It's really weird and kind of cool. You got a...

Twyla Tharp: Right.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, I guess so.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: I'm a little terrified to deal with it, or also, I haven't taken the time to really expose myself to it. It definitely is of interest, but when you talk about soccer or an athletic event, you can feel... In boxing, you can feel the impact. You can feel how much poundage is behind that punch.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, you boxed.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: With Teddy Atlas as your trainer.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: We have some friends of Teddy Atlas around here.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: What motivated that?

Twyla Tharp: I was in my early 40s, and the Olympics were in LA, and I was making a new piece, and I wanted to compete. But there are no competitions for what I do. I mean, a dancer's range is much more than an athlete's, not to the same degree and specialization, but across the board, there's speed, flexibility, maneuverability in air, coordination, flexibility.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Dancers got all of these components to a very high degree. So, no events for me at the Olympics, but I could make a piece that would be highly athletic, and I wanted to be in the very best possible shape I could be in.

Twyla Tharp: So, I decided that the training that was involved in a boxer being in shape, was more extreme than what I was doing with my dancing regimen.

Twyla Tharp: And that the rope coordination, the stamina being involved, the power coming off the punch, the grounding of the body so that you had a punch, the willingness to take the blow in exchange for the unwillingness to go down. You would not go down. You're not going down.

Twyla Tharp: And we don't do that in dance, so I figured, well, I'll go where they do do that. So, we were running steps backwards. This is a very good thing. And shadow boxing, it's a great, great training format.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, I agree. As a neuroscientist, I have to put a call out against sparring for anyone who's not trying to make it a profession, and maybe even for those that are, that's their choice. But speed bag work and the visual coordination that's involved is also incredible. Near, far, but also just switching from peripheral to central vision is... I imagine it improves the brain in many, many ways except for the getting hit in the head part.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Twyla Tharp: Well, probably.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: And you're also well known for being quite strong. Tell us about your deadlift record.

Twyla Tharp: Well, I was training in a real weight gym with competitive weightlifters. And was very serious from the time I was probably in my 50s until mid-60s, say. And that you were nobody in that gym if you didn't do your body weight for three on the bench. I mean, what are you in here for, right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: So, it had that kind of requirement to it, which is very encouraging if you want to lift heavy weight. And also snap pneumonia, right? Which is like, okay. I actually never did that, but the jolt of pulling more weight off the ground than you really can do or you have ever done really does send a rush through the body that is unique.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm. And what was your personal record?

Twyla Tharp: 227.

Andrew Huberman: 227 deadlift.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Awesome.

Twyla Tharp: Well, I don't know about that. I mean, you just do it day in, day out.

Andrew Huberman: Ah, just awesome.

Twyla Tharp: I don't know, you can't train day in, day out, but training rigorously and continuously for probably eight or 10 years, yeah.

Andrew Huberman: I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge one of our sponsors, LMNT. LMNT is an electrolyte drink that has everything you need and nothing you don't. That means the electrolytes, sodium, magnesium, and potassium, all in the correct ratios, but no sugar. Proper hydration is critical for brain and body function. Even a slight degree of dehydration can diminish your cognitive and physical performance. It's also important that you get adequate electrolytes.

Andrew Huberman: The electrolytes, sodium, magnesium, and potassium, are vital for the functioning of all cells in your body, especially your neurons or your nerve cells. Drinking LMNT makes it very easy to ensure that you're getting adequate hydration and adequate electrolytes. My days tend to start really fast, meaning I have to jump right into work or right into exercise. So to make sure that I'm hydrated and I have sufficient electrolytes, when I first wake up in the morning, I drink 16 to 32 ounces of water with an LMNT packet dissolved in it.

Andrew Huberman: I also drink LMNT dissolved in water during any kind of physical exercise that I'm doing, especially on hot days when I'm sweating a lot and losing water and electrolytes. LMNT has a bunch of great-tasting flavors. In fact, I love them all. I love the watermelon, the raspberry, the citrus, and I really love the lemonade flavor. So if you'd like to try LMNT, you can go to drinklmnt.com/huberman to claim a free LMNT sample pack with any purchase. Again, that's drinklmnt.com/huberman to claim a free sample pack.

Andrew Huberman: Several times you've mentioned the barre.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: I think most of u understand there's a barre along the wall with a mirror sometimes behind it, et cetera. For the uninformed, like for me, what is barre work really about? And could you give us an example of a few... I mean, is it designed to improve flexibility? Is it for... What is this notion of the barre?

Twyla Tharp: All the above. A barre is a set regimen of exercises that are developed to strengthen the structure of the body to basically approach the jumps to gain height in the air for the men, for the women if they're working en pointe, the strength in the legs and the torso to be able to support that weight in the little area down here.

Twyla Tharp: And so, it's developed essentially from... Barre's evolved, but basically their format is brilliantly designed, and begins with usually plié, the terminology is French, which means to fold. So you're folding the body in a plié. You're folding, you're going down, and the positions are first, second, third, fourth, and fifth, okay?

Twyla Tharp: First, you have actually one center that comes off of here and here, or you're off to this side, or you're off to that side. But if you're working very rigorously, you're working to develop that single center in first.

Twyla Tharp: Second is a much more evolved, kind of higher muscular kind of situation where it's being supported from the torso and the leg muscles more than from the feet. The third position is never used because third looks like a bad fifth, so it's just been eliminated, which is kind of too bad, because I actually do use third. But not if I think it's at a moment where it could be judgmentally determined, actually, it was an uncrossed fifth. Oh, dear.

Twyla Tharp: But in any case. So third weight is somewhere between openly distributed and crossed through a single center between the two legs, okay? This is the fourth, right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And the fifth, that fourth is closed, so that it's just a reduced, even higher center, okay? In these positions, first, second, usually not third, first, second, fourth, and fifth, plié. First, to bend, to fold. Next, tendu, to stretch, to reach out from that base. Not so far as you're going to fall, but far enough so that you have to evolve and occupy a little bit more space each time you do it.

Twyla Tharp: And you will go first from the tendu to a plié, to a tendu to a plié, and then tendu to a straight leg, which, by drawing in, you're pulling the center even higher. And so, therefore, it comes later in the series of exercises. They're designed to evolve, right?

Twyla Tharp: After the stretches comes the rond de jambe, one of the few exercises actually that's circular. Most of Ballet comes from Fencing. It's very linear. It's the attack, it's the retreat. But it doesn't have a whole lot of that going on unless somebody's gotten very ambition, flamboyant with their fencing styles. Could be, I don't know.

Twyla Tharp: But in any case, rond de jambe is the circling of the leg from a full fourth forward all the way to an open second, all the way to a full fourth back, all the way back to your second, all the way back to your fourth forward and down. Full rotation. Both sides, by the way.

Twyla Tharp: You're always reversing, even the ones that are in a symmetrical position, you still reverse right and left because, as I'm sure you're well aware, right and left occupy your body all the time and are constantly arguing with one another. We have an interior conflict going on that makes almost anything else in life impossible. But so we have right and left, which we're always trying to balance, okay?

Twyla Tharp: After rond de jambe, you can have petit battement, which is little throws. Little throws. So from your fifth or from your first, you're reaching quickly out, little darting movements, right? Then you can have frappé, which is to beat. Frappé. And so from the ankle, it'll be a flexed foot that extends, boom, and boom.

Twyla Tharp: And all of this is about developing relevé, to lift, to relevé, right? Up to the metatarsal as high as you can get, pulling up through all of this, relevé. And this develops the strength that you need to jump because from the plié down, you're going to drive up. And the more power you have down here, the more you can get up.

Twyla Tharp: That little extra eighth of an inch counts, okay? So frappé. After frappé is grand battement, the big battement, the big throw, all the way up and down. But not all the way up, changing the angle of the hip so that the rotation is going to alter the line. Holding the hip straight through, up. E up. E up.

Twyla Tharp: Either through fourth, or through second, or through arabesque and back. Those are the fundamentals. Now, if you're Merce Cunningham, you can operate in all of the interstices through all of that. But you still have the regulation of the body's map, and that's what the ballet has already done.

Andrew Huberman: Amazing.

Twyla Tharp: Not amazing, just very highly evolved in terms of how to control movement, in terms of strengthening and developing the body.

Andrew Huberman: Did the people that developed this care about the underlying physiology, or they just... And I'm not saying they should, but it seems like an incredible intuition, at least, that they came up with it.

Twyla Tharp: You'll forgive me for saying something stupid like this. The body is very smart, and one of my problems has always been, what knows what first? Okay. Does the body already get it, brain, and we're trying to educate you? Or is it the brain telling the body what to do? In the case of the classical technique, I think it's actually the body that feels that it could get a little higher if only its rotation were a little more open.

Twyla Tharp: So it urges that "ugh" and that "mwah." I don't think the brain is going, "Well, you know what? If you actually could open that leg out, you'd go higher." And you're going, "Brain, I don't know about that. What does that mean?" You don't know what it means. The body knows what that means.

Andrew Huberman: I've heard it said we think that we're a brain with a body, but perhaps we were a body that later got a brain.

Twyla Tharp: There are certain sophisticated movements, rhythms, and so forth. I mean, for example, a great composer is a great mathematician, right?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And the indications and the divisions of time I would accept as coming particularly because of how you see the notation and how the note can be subdivided. It's a very visual thing. Once you're into the eye, you're into the brain. I mean, it's like, do you know what I'm saying?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: This is more about the body, and this, how the toes are going about its business down here, are very much involved about the body.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. Thinking sometimes is really overrated.

Twyla Tharp: For sure.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. As human old world primates, which we got a bunch more machinery up front in the prefrontal cortex, which let us think and plan and reflect and strategize a lot more. Also allowed humans to do bad things a lot more, trickery, and things like that, but also to plan really incredible, wonderful things.

Andrew Huberman: But I do think in many ways, it was at the expense of some of the machinery involved in these... I hate using the language lower. Let's just say more fundamental intuition, right? I don't want to give too many anecdotes, but years ago, I developed an obsession with comparative neurology. There's this beautiful journal, it's hundreds of years old, called "The Journal of Comparative Neurology."

Andrew Huberman: I was fortunate enough to participate with that journal, but for a while, reviewing these papers, which, for modern science, people don't really care about these papers. They're like, "What is the cerebellar vermis shape of the Atlas turtle?" I don't even know if there's an Atlas turtle, but I guess we were talking about Teddy Atlas. Of the whatever, right? Of the two-toed, three-toed sloth, whatever all these weird species.

Andrew Huberman: But no single paper teaches you that much, except about this really arcane thing about the mallard duck hypothalamus or something. I'm sure that paper's in there, by the way. But when you start comparing the nervous systems of these different animals and the way they move and the way they think, because there are certainly papers about humans in there, you start getting emergent fundamentals.

Andrew Huberman: You go, "Oh, my goodness," once the forebrain got bigger, the cerebellum got a little smaller in this one area, and evolution starts to make a lot more sense. But evolution at the level of things like we're talking about today, movement and communication. And it leaves you with this question, which is a lot of the reason you're here today is, I think we all really want to understand, even if we don't know that we want to understand.

Andrew Huberman: What are we really here to do? What are we good at? How do we tap into these other aspects of ourselves?

Twyla Tharp: When you talk about the brain developing in different areas to different degrees, I sometimes wonder about, and I mean to be neither naive nor romantic here, the morality of the body. And if the people who run our governments and who design our social systems had a sense on a daily basis of preserving and protecting and honoring their physical bodies, if their brain would be allowed to concoct some of the schemata that then tell bodies everywhere what they're going to be doing.

Andrew Huberman: Tell me more. I think I understand. I do believe that taking care of the body and one's health first is fundamental. Anyone that's lost their health for any amount of time understands what I'm talking about. But we don't tend to do that. We prioritize the brain a lot without understanding that it exists in this whole context of the body.

Twyla Tharp: It's not just health. It's propriety and excellence. Who wants to nurture and encourage the body to realize its full potential that it was gifted with when it was born?

Andrew Huberman: Let's say you and I were in charge of education.

Twyla Tharp: Okay.

Andrew Huberman: Do you think kids, teenagers, maybe even young adults, and older, should all do something akin to gymnastics?

Twyla Tharp: It's an interesting thought. Which one? I mean, I respect gymnastics a lot. I get dancers sometimes who are not ballet-trained but who are gymnastically trained, and they're courageous in a different way. They have a different center, but they have a willingness to throw through space that a dancer they're not trained in the ballet to throw. There are moments that you dart forward, but they're very restricted, whereas a gymnast is continuously comfortable with a kind of spatial explosion, which is a beautiful thing.

Andrew Huberman: Should there be a policy that every young person needs to do a form of movement that encompasses a lot of different tempos and some jumping, some rolling, some stretching? Because we tend to specialize in sports very early, or people decide they're no good at sports or the arts.

Twyla Tharp: No, no, they're not allowed to do that.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Sorry. Something they've got to find that they're good enough at to encourage themselves to respect themselves, otherwise, they quit.

Andrew Huberman: I will interrupt you here just to say that I think this brings us back to your early development and expectations on people, on kids, and adults, in other words, standards. I heard somebody say something really interesting recently, that was, it used to be, now I'm sounding like an... I am 50, it used to be that there were pretty high standards set on all of us.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Mm-hmm.

Andrew Huberman: Whether or not we got a lot of love and support depended on the household, but the standards were always high. There seems to be a period of time in which there was a lot more love and support, some people will disagree with me, but maybe standards weren't held as in high regard. Of course, it varies by family, varies by circumstance. But I think ideally we get back to a point where standards are high for everyone. Like etiquette, God forbid. Not going to the movies in your pajamas, for instance.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Not just etiquette but also behavior, which group, social dance, whether it's ballroom or square dance, there are rules and regulations, and there are ways that you know that you can work that are going to respect the traffic pattern, if nothing else, and that's going to transfer to how you drive a car.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And this gets established early and deeply in a young person, and we're talking here, oh, I don't know, second grader, third graders. I mean, as much as I make light of my mother, and I don't make light of her at all, but sometimes feel challenged by the education that I received, it was not a bad education. It was across the boards. It was very difficult for me societally.

Twyla Tharp: But I was grounded in music, I was grounded in movement, I was grounded in these different forms of community activity, including string quartets. I was grounded in the family-owned Foothill Drive-In Theater between Rialto and Fontana, okay?

Twyla Tharp: I grew up, from the time I was eight until I went to college, watching a screen and getting myself into the snack bar when there would be a run on hot dogs because it was really boring up here, and I saw boring come, get to the snack bar, sell hot dogs, okay? Plus, it was a place where the speakers often didn't work. There were a lot of cars. 600 cars. It was a big, big movie house, okay? And a big screen. And so I learned to watch action without sound.

Twyla Tharp: And I learned to watch movement and what communicated without language.

Andrew Huberman: "It's incredible you're saying this." One of the things that I listed and wanted to talk to you about is this concept of wordlessness. A few years ago, I started practicing something because someone said, "You should try this. You should try to walk down the street and just feel what's going on, and try not to get into a verbal dialogue about it. Just experience life through the lens of what it must be like to be some other species of animal."

Andrew Huberman: And this might sound silly to people, but it's an incredible portal into how limited our experience of things normally is. And maybe for some people, they're always in wordlessness, and they need to get more into words.

Andrew Huberman: But it sounds like you had an incredible upbringing. First of all, you were taught to be hardworking. I mean, I think one can't overemphasize how, I mean, hard work is awesome and because it's a super skill for anything you encounter, right? But watching the movies without sound, that's incredible.

Twyla Tharp: Well, even more, I had twin brothers and a sister who was born three days before they were a year old, so essentially they were triplets. And my mother gave up and started feeding them all with the same spoon and put them in the same room. And they developed an idiolect, which happens with, you probably know this, a certain percentage of twins.

Twyla Tharp: A language, before they learn to speak English, they evolve because they're so close to one another all the time, and it's a guttural syllabic form of communication. I could speak it, but I could certainly understand it. My parents could not understand it nor speak it, so I became the family translator.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm.

Twyla Tharp: So from day one, I'm observing and serving the audience.

Andrew Huberman: I love it.

Twyla Tharp: And it's non-verbal.

Andrew Huberman: This is wild. I'm close friends with a pair of identical twins, and they tell this story from their childhood, where one walks in and goes up to the toast of the other one, they're women now, they were little girls then, and takes her fingers and goes like this over the toast.

Twyla Tharp: Right.

Andrew Huberman: To this day, the other one won't eat that type of toast.

Andrew Huberman: But it wasn't like, "Oh, this is bad." They were just, something was communicated in the movement, and to this day, will not touch that type of toast.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Right.

Andrew Huberman: And it's so funny, and they have tons of stories about this, that they can communicate without words.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Right. And a lot of it was sign... I don't remember a lot of this was bread and butter. And so very early, I got the idea that movement communicates. Who needs all this garble on top, and your brain has got it, what is that, right or left? That's going to be that side. It's going to be right. You don't need to translate it into language to understand what the movement is asking for.

Andrew Huberman: But unlike so many artists and creatives, the world is very fortunate that you were asked to be a translator because you don't exist in some... I could think of names here, but I don't want to insult anyone. There are some artists that are genuinely weird to the rest of us because we can't understand them. Now, they're not necessarily weird, they're just different.

Andrew Huberman: But I have to imagine there are probably many, many incredible creatives whose work we never hear or see because there's no one there to translate it for them, and they certainly can't do it for themselves. You have to have a certain amount of fluency in the world of business, in the world of being able to communicate with words, otherwise, your work doesn't get out there, right? Maybe that's why there's so few people that really sit where they do in their craft.

Twyla Tharp: I think that a word here is "objectivity." That in doing work, there are moments where you have to get outside that work, and you have to look at it as an outsider.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm. How do you do that? Do you film it and watch?

Twyla Tharp: I do it by pulling myself out of the action. I mean, there were times when I danced, right? And I danced inside as well as trying to get outside. This is genuinely a way to become extremely neurotic, and it's a very difficult task. In some ways, it's very rewarding because the whole thing evolves from you, and plus, you're the jury.

Twyla Tharp: You can't maintain it for very long, and anybody who makes something wants to have the capacity to be unemotional about it, get back, forget how you feel about it. What does it say to you?

Twyla Tharp: You, in a way, become your own translator. Does this read?

Andrew Huberman: You said something really, really useful, I think, about critics in your book. You said that the good ones, the honest ones, the ones that aren't just trying to get some clickbait or get someone to read their story so they can get their couple thousand bucks so they can make rent that month. The really good critics keep us honest about who we're supposed to be as creators.

Andrew Huberman: Now, that makes it sound like people who aren't creating stuff that's being critiqued out in the world don't have anything to learn from what you're about to say. But I would argue that from the very beginning, when we start to create anything, a short story, a poem, even if we're just daydreaming about what we might create, it's impossible to not get into the "How is this going to land? What are people going to think?"

Andrew Huberman: So learning how to hold critique is critical to the creative process, even if journalists aren't eventually writing about your work.

Andrew Huberman: How do you work with the inner critic, which is really about outer critics, let's be honest. How do you work with that, and what's your relationship to that?

Twyla Tharp: This is very, very difficult because you have to love what you're doing. Anything that's going to be really meaningful, there has to be an extraordinary degree of love. And we do refer in my office to the child of that work. Each dance, in a way, is your gift, and it's your child, and somebody's out here, and they're going to slit its throat. How are you supposed to feel about that?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Also, because what we do is very, very personal. Musicians translate it into sound. There's a certain distancing from them personally. We're very personal. You speak bad of my dance, you speak bad of my body.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: That don't go down so well, right? So it's difficult to process the exterior critic's word, and on the other hand, as I said, one still has to, even though you love the thing, you got to... I mean, long ago, my trainer actually had two huge wolfhounds, and I made the mistake one day of criticizing one of them. I mean, never criticize a guy's dog, okay?

Andrew Huberman: This is true.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. You can criticize the child, but not the dog, all right?

Andrew Huberman: Wolfhounds are beautiful animals.

Twyla Tharp: They are.

Andrew Huberman: Very majestic animals.

Twyla Tharp: Yes, they had to. But so yeah, there you are. This critic just called your dog a bad name. And okay, maybe your dog has got only three legs and then six months to live. I'm being cruel, but am I? I'm being realistic. Your dog has three legs and six months to live.

Andrew Huberman: Well, that's not criticism. That's an observation.

Twyla Tharp: Observation.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, but it comes across because it's less than perfect.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: So you see, it's a difficult arena. There's no single answer. It's like neon. You've got to shift on, shift off, shift on, shift off.

Twyla Tharp: Is it crazy? A little.

Andrew Huberman: I'm excited to share that Mateína, the yerba mate drink I helped create, is now available at Whole Foods stores nationwide. Longtime listeners of this podcast know that yerba mate is my preferred caffeine source. It provides smooth energy without giving you the jitters, and it has a lot of other potential benefits, including helping to regulate your blood sugar, improving digestion, mild appetite suppression, and much more. Mateína is my absolute favorite of all the yerba mate brands out there, and I've tried them all.

Andrew Huberman: Given my love for Mateína, I decided to become a part-owner in the business, and I helped them create their new line of products, which are all entirely zero-sugar. These zero-sugar cold-brew Mateína flavors are fantastic. I drink at least three cans of them every single day. You'll often see them on the table during my podcast recordings. I absolutely love the product, and I'm proud to now have it sold at Whole Foods. So check out Mateína at Whole Foods stores nationwide. It's cold-brewed with the absolute best ingredients. It has zero sugar, and it tastes amazing. And if you don't have a Whole Foods near you, you can also buy it online at drinkmateina.com

Andrew Huberman: Every once in a while, I find myself thinking, "Oh, in the early 2000s, the way art and music and media was, it was better. Growing up in this era." But then I realized that people have probably been saying that sort of thing forever, and that for young people now, I have a niece who just went off to college.

Andrew Huberman: She's not thinking about how it was back then. For her, it's happening now. And I think it's hard for us to adapt to the fact that we were young once and now we're less young, and that it's all new for them.

Andrew Huberman: And so the question is, and they don't have that frame of reference, so when it comes to critics, when it comes to dance and art, do you see things getting better, worse, or do you just think of it as like, "Oh, it's always been just an evolution?" I have a hard time going, "Oh, we had great music in the '90s. Like, it was awesome music came out in the..."

Twyla Tharp: You should have been around in the '70s, man.

Andrew Huberman: Exactly. That's the point. Right. So, for people who are 16, 18 now, they're not thinking that way. They're thinking, "We got all that music, and there's all this other great music."

Andrew Huberman: So I think the goal perhaps is to just stay open.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. I think it's not judgmental, it's not good or bad, it's "What can I learn from this? What can I take from this? What can I transpose from this to put over here? What can I use?" Make everything transactional.

Andrew Huberman: Can you elaborate on that?

Twyla Tharp: No, I like it like that.

Andrew Huberman: Full stop. Okay.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. No, transactional, what serves me here? What can I use?

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Sometimes "transactional" gets a bad name. You are trying to use something. Yeah, I'm trying to use something.

Andrew Huberman: Well, the whole thing of great artists steal. Nothing is a new idea, this kind of thing. Do you believe that?

Twyla Tharp: Absolutely. To some degree. I mean, that's why it's one of my privileges to work with the life of a composer, if I'm serious about that. I worked on "Amadeus," right? So I read all of Mozart's writings, which are voluminous, and looked at every manuscript he had ever touched. And I was given access to this. Why wouldn't you take advantage of that?

Andrew Huberman: For the movie "Amadeus?"

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Love that movie.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you. We did too.

Andrew Huberman: Love that movie.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: The images of the lime being thrown over the body is still imprinted in my mind.

Twyla Tharp: Oh, yeah.

Andrew Huberman: But it tells you about that era and how little people had.

Twyla Tharp: Totally.

Twyla Tharp: Totally. And how much was preserved from the era? We shot in Prague for Vienna. It was hard working there, still under the regime. And that, in a way, put it closer to what Mozart had to deal with, the sort of restrictions that he had. But the research that went into that picture was enormous. All of the illumination was from candles. All of the illumination in the candles.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: They used the same beeswax as they had used 200 years before. All the mechanisms on stage were what were used in the original productions. And because we shot in the opera house, which had not been updated, in fact, it's one of the ways Milos got back in, was to say, "Okay, we will pay for the reconstruction of the opera house when we're done," and they took him up on it. But I was using the same mechanics under the stage that Mozart had.

Twyla Tharp: The door that opened into the orchestra was the door he touched when he came in to join the orchestra. And we had scenes that had live fire. We were swinging live fire around. You don't do this, but we were. And out of the floor, there were little holes, and we figured out that those little holes were a special kind of pollen that they put down, and if they lit them, they would send up sparks, and we were doing the sparks from the floor out of the pollen.

Twyla Tharp: And you had chandeliers coming down that had hundreds of candles, and in between takes, you're shifting all of the candles in 50 chandeliers coming down here before you can do the next take. Meanwhile, you got the clothes that are in here, and there are no gussets. So nobody's arm is going any higher than this. You got the men in heels like this. Nobody is running with huge strides. Stuff like that. Wow. I don't know what to do with that kind of information other than to marvel at human invention.

Andrew Huberman: We've definitely come a long way.

Twyla Tharp: I don't know that we've come a long way. Things were different, and they maximized their resources.

Andrew Huberman: I will say candles are better than white-light LEDs, but that's a topic for another podcast.

Twyla Tharp: Probably. When are we going to do that?

Andrew Huberman: Incandescents are better than LEDs. But I'm just thinking about all these candles, and I'm wondering whether or not it was very, very warm to work in that environment.

Twyla Tharp: Sure, it was very, very warm.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: The people were sweating all the time. What do you think the smell was in the 18th century? Very stinky is how smell was in the 18th century.

Andrew Huberman: I had no idea what went into the making of that film.

Twyla Tharp: It was real.

Andrew Huberman: A spectacular film. Everyone should see that.

Twyla Tharp: It was real.

Andrew Huberman: It'll also give you a window into how psychiatric illness was treated. There's that brutal scene from, I guess, they called them insane asylums.

Twyla Tharp: Yep.

Andrew Huberman: And nowadays we probably understand that 95% of those people were probably suffering from things that nice at-home care probably would have resolved.

Twyla Tharp: Or there's a pill for it.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. Or there's a pill for.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: Or a combination of sunlight and pills, and other things. Speaking of which, what's your view on modern versus ancient medicine versus the body just being really smart?

Twyla Tharp: I know not much about either ancient or modern medicine. I'm not sure I'm equipped to have a view on these things. I simply try to stay as close to what is, forgive the word, natural as possible.

Twyla Tharp: In terms of eating, I am currently not eating except for this trip, okay? No carbs, no sugar, all right? The keto diet, I find to be more manageable. I can control it better. I know where my weight is. I can feel how close to the bone, where whatawata. I got to hee, haw, haw. You can't do that if you're eating a lot of pasta.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: And also, I fortunately cannot cook, therefore, I basically eat everything raw. I can eat meat raw. I certainly eat vegetables raw. When I am exaggerating, I can use the oven, okay. I can boil water, but that's about it. No sauces ever.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: Nothing decorative. I've often said if there were a pill for food, I'd take it. I'm not sure I would because I'm not sure it would have what I needed in it. I'm not sure I'm getting that anyway, but at least I'm making an effort, and I know where it comes from. I don't like mystery a lot.

Andrew Huberman: So it sounds like meat, fish, fruits, and vegetables are your staples.

Twyla Tharp: C'est ça.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, likewise. And I think it's funny that nowadays, it makes total sense when we say the carbs and sugar are really the problem in most cases. Whereas for years, it felt like the public health space around nutrition was utterly confused. It was like fat is the bad thing, then protein, and then meat is the bad thing. I mean, deli meats probably they are not great for us, but healthily sourced.

Twyla Tharp: Terrible.

Twyla Tharp: We went through a period, probably of about a year or even two, where we carb-loaded because we thought we'd have more energy, we'd be stronger. We just got heavier. But anyway, maybe we had a little more power.

Andrew Huberman: I have a friend whose daughter is very interested in ballet. She actually is part of a conservatory that goes up... They actually live in San Francisco. I don't think she's part of the San Francisco Ballet, but there's something adjacent to that. And I said, "How, how is that?" Because you hear these stereotypes of it's brutal on young girls as, probably boys as well, but minds about their weight and the training, and it's unhealthy.

Andrew Huberman: And he said nowadays they've adjusted for some of that, and they really try and keep a healthier environment. What's your view on that? I mean, standards versus health. I mean, this is a topic that spills over into everything. In science, I used to work 100-hour weeks. 100. I heard there was a guy that worked 101, so I worked 102. Then I realized that I couldn't sustain that. I'm not suggesting anyone do that, but everyone has a kind of war story from their time.

Andrew Huberman: But now there does seem to be more care taken to mental health, physical health. So how do you balance that in the world of dance, where you want standards to continue to stand or rise, but you also don't want people mentally destroyed?

Twyla Tharp: This is a hard one.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: There's always going to be a trade-off to some degree. I mean, the stress of performance is, whether it's athletic performance or dance performance, is extreme. And unfortunately, it's been my experience that the better the performer, the worse the nerves before.

Andrew Huberman: Huh.

Twyla Tharp: Sorry about that. The more intensely important that curtain going up is to that person, the possibility of failure is always there. And the degree of rehearsing that's going to address that is "Why didn't you do more?" is always the response. So that is, I'm sorry. It's a reality. It's a choice. Don't choose that profession.

Twyla Tharp: We can't make life totally nice. It is partially what it is. Choose something else. Often, and I'm not alone in this, one hears it often, a parent or a child even will come up, "Can I be a dancer?" I say, "Don't do it. Find something else if you possibly can. If you can't, be a dancer."

Andrew Huberman: Because you want to set that thick line.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. And there are other folks who will find their own way to address that line and who will massage that line, and it's part of creativity is addressing those old lines and boundaries, classical, modern. Oy.

Andrew Huberman: It's interesting when you put that barrier, you naturally select for the people that really want it.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: Yesterday I had an early morning call with a friend of mine who's a former what they call "Tier 1 SEAL team operator." So he was in the Navy SEALs, but then there's another selection process within it for the Tier 1 or the sort of elite within that already elite community.

Andrew Huberman: And he has children, and I said, "Are they interested in military?" He said, "One of them is." And I said, "Is he interested in going to the teams?" And he's like, "He is." And I said, "What are you telling him?" And he said, "I'm telling him not to do it, and he keeps coming back that he wants to do it, and I'm reassured." He keeps telling him, "Don't do it. You're going to hate it. It's going to be the worst thing ever." And he keeps coming back, "No, I want to do it. No, I want." So he's convinced now that he actually wants to do it.

Twyla Tharp: Well, but unfortunately, telling a kid not to do it is a bait and can just engender, "I want to do it just to prove that you're going to go up against authority." That's not the right reason to select.

Andrew Huberman: Sure.

Twyla Tharp: Better to just say, "You got to really, really want to do this. Even more, can't you find something else?" And if they can question it, they don't want to do it enough.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm. He did add that, "If he feels he likes it more than it sucks," his words, "then he'll be okay."

Twyla Tharp: I would buy that.

Andrew Huberman: There's got to be some tilt in the seesaw more towards "I like this more than it sucks."

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, I'd buy that.

Andrew Huberman: Hmm.

Twyla Tharp: That's fair.

Andrew Huberman: And I see a lot of parallels between the communities that you come from and he comes from, frankly.

Twyla Tharp: Elite is elite.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: It has a price to pay.

Andrew Huberman: Do you think nowadays, because of social media and the internet, there's a larger pool of dancers to select from, and talent that gets selected to work with you, for instance, is better because it's just such a bigger pool? That top 1% reflects an even better 1%?

Twyla Tharp: It's different because the talent is being trained and challenged in a different way as young people. In other words, there are now competitive activities for dance. I started to say activities, sports, for dance. It's not quite a sport, though it converged, which is fine. But when I was evolving as a dancer, we had very strict borders.

Twyla Tharp: This was tap, this was ballet, this was modern, this is jazz over here. And you could step across the borders and try out different of these, even acquire knowledge from all of them to become something. But you had to do it on your own, and then you would work to gain acceptance into whatever performing arena.

Twyla Tharp: Now, children, very young children, eight years old, even younger, six-year-old kids, there are competitions for children as dancers or as performers. And this engenders a totally different purpose and performance in the kid. I was not... I'm Buster Keaton, right? I take it on the chin, stoic, down, out, or I make the move, right?

Twyla Tharp: The kids are out there to sell it, and they're out there to get their points. And it is partially in their technique, but it's also immediately in their manipulation of the audience. Great. That's called performing, and maybe you'll be a good actor, but in the meantime, you're short-changing your technique because you're not asking the audience to just gauge you on what you can do physically, but how you can sell it, because you want those points, and so do your parents.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: So, these competitions, in a way, are very difficult, and for a long time, I wouldn't work with competition-trained dancers. Now, I find that it's broadened, and that the kids are more sophisticated in the ways that they attack technique for performing, and they're also hardened in a way. I can put them in younger. I don't worry, they're going to be nervous. They're not going to be nervous.

Twyla Tharp: They were nervous when they were out here trying to get, you know, a graded 30 points on the whata-whata and the which-which to get the hits for the whata-whata. And they're no longer nervous about squat. So put them in. This is great.

Twyla Tharp: But in the meantime, they are doing it for reasons outside of the thing itself, for what they can gain from it, from their internet hits, from their hunga, their hina, the whata-whata, as opposed to just doing it for the thing itself and taking what comes from it. It's different.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, that extrinsic reward. While it's important to keep people moving forward if they want to be a professional, it definitely contaminates the core motivation.

Twyla Tharp: And what the kids will accomplish, because they won't have to do it the hard way.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: They'll do it the easy way if it works as well. I was always trained to do it the hard way. You can always do it the easy way, train for the hard way. And I can see that in performers. And a performer who has done it the hard way has more range. And when they work, you're going to be more interested in them because they're making more choices. And an interesting artist is a choice maker. An interesting performer is always about making choice. That's what will keep you focused on them. If they're just doing what they think is going to win, you're going, "Really?"

Andrew Huberman: Listen, I love social media. I teach on social media. But the problem with social media as it relates to craft and feedback, et cetera, is that it puts you on a reinforcement schedule of, "You did something yesterday, you can put it out there, and you can immediately get the response." I think there's a sweet spot between practice, mastery, and feedback. Animals, of which we are, we adapt to certain contingencies.

Andrew Huberman: You know, every 48 hours, I expect something back. Every 72 hours, every... And I always tell people if they want to do a PhD, you got to love the topic, you got to embrace the lifestyle. But also, if nothing else, it will teach you to work very, very hard for four years to get something.

Andrew Huberman: Sometimes there are a couple of publications in there, or more or less, but if nothing else, it will teach you how to work very, very hard for something that only comes to you at the earliest four years from now, which I think is very valuable.

Twyla Tharp: Even four years is like a promise. You might want to think about working for no reward.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And after four years, you don't get anything other than the opportunity to continue.

Andrew Huberman: I love that. I love that. My graduate advisor put this into me. We published a paper in Science. I was so excited, and I said, "We're going to throw a party. We're going to celebrate." And she just laughed, and she was like, "I could buy you a pizza, but I'm not even going to do that." She said something to that extent. I can't remember the exact words, but I remember what came next. She said, "You already got the party."

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, right.

Andrew Huberman: And I was like, "You're right. I loved doing the experiment." And we went on, I think we published close to 10 papers together. And when I wasn't thinking about the PhD, in fact, they forced me to take my qualifying exam. I didn't want to take it. I just loved doing experiments. And if you love doing experiments, turns out you publish a lot of papers. Publish a lot of papers; turns out it's easy to get a PhD.

Twyla Tharp: Right. Exactly.

Andrew Huberman: Et cetera.

Twyla Tharp: You're doing something for the right reasons, not to get something else.

Andrew Huberman: But it's hard to explain that to someone who's really driven. Not even nowadays. It's just hard to explain that to somebody because I think people who are really driven also, they want people to understand something.

Twyla Tharp: They need to understand excellence on their own terms, not from outside, but from inside. I can do more. I can do more. That's what I'm interested in. Oh, you like that? Not enough. I want more.

Andrew Huberman: Just letting that really sink in. I totally agree. I'm just trying to think of the messaging that works for kids.

Twyla Tharp: Almost none. I have a grandson, believe me.

Andrew Huberman: They operate on their own, in their own frame.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. It worked on you. Worked on me to some extent.

Twyla Tharp: Yes, because my mother was a concert pianist, and she wasn't able to... The war came, and she started teaching to help support the family. And in a way, I think, I was aware of the sacrifice that she had made, but I also heard the level of excellence. From the time I was a teeny, itsy-bitsy, I went to her lessons. She'd continued, and I heard the practicing. And I think even with no training, I heard that that was better than that, and they got closer. And you develop your own morality. You don't have somebody telling you what is good and what is bad.

Andrew Huberman: It sounds like, if I may, that you develop your own internal standard. That's very high.

Twyla Tharp: It's very high, it's unattainable, and you're going to hate yourself a lot of the time.

Andrew Huberman: They don't tell you that, but it's true.

Twyla Tharp: Well, I'm just saying.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, it's true. I don't know if hate... Hate's a strong word.

Twyla Tharp: It is a strong word.

Andrew Huberman: Maybe not satisfied, but...

Twyla Tharp: Sorry, it's called "hate."

Andrew Huberman: I love your honesty. You've said before, "Before you can think outside the box, you have to have a box." But you also talk about having an actual box.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: Explain.

Twyla Tharp: Well, the actual box holds the tangible items that are very sensory, that have the feel or the smell or the weight of when you first thought that idea. Maybe your dance isn't going to look like a rock, but when you picked up that rock, there was a certain kind of physical resistance, and that suggested a kind of movement. And if you don't keep that rock, you'll forget sometimes where it came from.

Twyla Tharp: I was working on a film script once, and I was told, "Look, write down your initial instinct, your initial idea for what the film is to be, put it in a drawer, and lock the drawer because there are times when you're going to not know what the f*** you're doing. Unlock the drawer and remind yourself." That rock can remind you of that original instinct, that original movement that evolved from it, and you go, "Oh, yeah, yeah, that's where I am. That's what I'm doing."

Twyla Tharp: But we overthink things, and we compound it, and it's not that complicated. You want to keep it as simple as possible. You want to, I think, keep it as close to the initial reason you wanted to do it, the initial sense of excitement, and again, to use the same old word, "Love," that you had for that moment in time that you wanted to share.

Andrew Huberman: I love the idea of anchoring to physical items around something that's conceptual because the conceptual journey can be, whether or not it's a book or a dance or whatever, a podcast, it can be so opaque at times, and you're just you're trying to stay anchored to the center, to the spine, but it can be really tough.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: And having a physical object that you understand means A, and that's it. It's non-negotiable.

Twyla Tharp: There are certain things you don't forget.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: Those are the important things. That's what truth is. You don't forget it.

Andrew Huberman: I guess this is the reason we have plaques and wedding rings and things like that, is they symbolize something in a very simple way, that everyone understands, and in this case, it's important that you understand.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, but it's a symbol of.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: That's different.

Andrew Huberman: Mm.

Twyla Tharp: Symbol is different from the actual rock. The rock is the thing itself. It's not the symbol of anything. It's the rock.

Andrew Huberman: So, it has a property that is what you're trying to thread through your work.

Twyla Tharp: Yes. Doesn't stand for something else.

Andrew Huberman: It actually has that thing.

Twyla Tharp: And that's, in a way, why ritual... Because ritual is not quite the same as practice. Ritual is done for a purpose. It's done to accomplish an end. Purpose, you just do it.

Andrew Huberman: So, let's break those apart: ritual, purpose, and habit. If you were to separate those out.

Twyla Tharp: Okay. Ritual, to accomplish a goal or a kind of control. Practice, a consistent, ongoing activity that somehow keeps reocurring. Habit you do because you're in the habit of doing it. I mean, habit and practice are actually very close. Habit is dangerous because you got to do it that way. That's the habit for it. Practice is just get the job done. You can do it in different ways, but get the job done. Habit, you got to do it the same way.

Andrew Huberman: Throughout the entire listening to your book, I had this question in the back of my mind: Did you take weekends off?

Twyla Tharp: No. What's a weekend? It's, you know, it's a seven-day workweek here.

Andrew Huberman: Love it. You've gotten things like honorary degrees from Harvard, this kind of thing lot of accolades from a lot of different places. Do those things matter to you?

Twyla Tharp: No.

Twyla Tharp: No. They matter more to other folks. And sometimes I have trouble with them. They don't tell me anything that I have done or, more importantly, will do. Can I honestly say, it's not nice for somebody to say to you, "You've done a great job"? I can't say that. I can, you know, try to feel that it's...

Twyla Tharp: I think one thing about that kind of action is that it takes a magnanimous person to recall that they have a goal that's going to be ongoing, no matter how many accolades they get, but the people giving the accolades want to matter. They want to count. They want to believe that what you have done is important, and in a way, you owe it to them more than to yourself to accept that.

Andrew Huberman: I know you don't like the term, but you came up with it, and I think it's very interesting and important, which is this notion of "scratching," when you're searching for the next idea or the idea, like this notion of "scratching."

Twyla Tharp: Oh.

Andrew Huberman: Could you tell people what "scratching" is about?

Twyla Tharp: Okay. Two conditions where scratching is a kind of an approach. One is you're really lost, and you have no sense that there's any progress to be made, and if so, where's the direction to go? And you have to be patient with yourself in the situations, and just try something.

Twyla Tharp: And did it mean anything or not? And having the faith to continue that is a kind of scratching. The other is you know perfectly well where you're going. You just don't know how to get there. And in scratching, or essaying, or trying that approach, you still got to remember where your basic thing is, but you know you've got somewhere to go. That's a nicer place to be than when you are just in an absolute vacuum, and scratching for something that has meaning.

Andrew Huberman: And scratching can take a lot of forms. You've said it could be going to a museum and seeing what captures your eye. It could be just living your daily life and just making sure that you capture anything that kind of pokes through. Is that right?

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, being open about things, and being willing to be caught off guard, being willing to be surprised.

Andrew Huberman: Could you talk about movement and longevity? I mean, you're...

Twyla Tharp: How long have we got?

Andrew Huberman: As long as you want.

Twyla Tharp: I don't want. It's my least favorite topic, and it's my most important topic at the moment, which is why it's my least favorite topic. Bodies alter every so often, okay? A body at 10 is going to be different from a body at 20. What it can accomplish, 20 to 40, there's a kind of continuity in there that is encouraging. Over 40, the body is going to start behaving differently. 47, ugh!

Twyla Tharp: Fifties is getting a little bit numbed, and all of a sudden, you're feeling restricted, and you get pissed off. And you have got to find a way of respecting the fact that you can no longer do what you did when you were 20 or 25, but still, you're pretty potent. And that's a good thing. And I managed to push that. I was dancing still pretty hard until I was about 65, which is a long reach.

Twyla Tharp: But after 65, I began to feel really restricted. No, you can't do just anything, even once. And oh, by the way, what you're doing might not be strengthening the body. You might be weakening the body by repeating that. "Oh, my God, what do I do here?" Nothing. And 70, functional. 80 sucks.

Twyla Tharp: You're restricted now, and your body has lost facility, and you can't pretend it's any other way because you see it, and everybody else sees it, and you need help. And you don't like help. How do you maintain your independence, and still accept graciously help as a reality and not a shame? How do you accept a declining body as not demoralizing?

Twyla Tharp: Those are tough questions, and particularly if you're invested in the body, and it's where you learn what's true and what isn't true. It could be true for somebody who can still do it. It's not true for you because you can't... You still don't have that speed. You don't have that flexibility. You don't have that option. And so, it becomes, I suppose, and I haven't quite accomplished this, but I think about it obviously a lot, we all do, is an exchange rate. Okay, I'm going to have to give up a kind of, sort of physical independence, but in exchange for this, I can have a lot of goodwill.

Twyla Tharp: How can I circulate that goodwill? To get this thing done, that still feels as though it's a worthy enough accomplishment to offer. But it's a totally different mechanism, and its physicality translated differently. And you know one...

Twyla Tharp: Always, in the studio, I was a very good dancer, and I managed to build a career because dancers wanted to work with me because they become better dancers. And now, it is not a body that is dancing better than any other dancer. It is a body that is not moving and that needs still to be able to correspond to a great dancer with many, many options that you have something to offer them, and that you can realize something with them that is of great value.

Twyla Tharp: I dislike the word "mentor." I don't think about that much, because I like better the word "apprentice," that people learn. You don't teach them, they learn.

Andrew Huberman: Mm-hmm.

Twyla Tharp: And that is a component here, and I think that that's a kind of... I mean, the upside is you can still be mutual. You can still share this process, and it's the same as it ever was. You bring what you got, they bring what they got, you put them together, and you get more than the independent what-or-what-is. And that can still happen if you let it happen, and if you don't get too pissed off.

Andrew Huberman: Although being a little pissed might help in terms of the pushing through.

Twyla Tharp: Oh, wait. Yeah, everybody needs a little pissed all the time.

Andrew Huberman: The thing I heard you say once, which really stuck with me, was that you think that perhaps one of the reasons why people age at the level of the brain, and their level of curiosity, is that they start moving less, that it works in that direction. And I started observing people of different ages. And indeed, even just the amount of gesticulating that people do, it starts to decline over time. You're an exception to this.

Andrew Huberman: I know only a few other exceptions to that rule. I think it is a rule. You look at kids, they're moving all the time, and I think it drops off fairly linearly after, as you said, probably about age 40 or so, people start moving less. There's a species of ocean animal that when it lands down on a rock, it actually eats its own brain.

Twyla Tharp: Oh!

Andrew Huberman: Except the part that just keeps it alive there to sense when something swims over it, and then it can do its thing. In other words, if we stop moving, our nervous system atrophies, and that's very clear.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: And it seems that the distal, the fingers and the feet, the neurons that control those certainly lose their strength before we lose our trunk strength, and so on. So, there's this kind of outward-to-centre atrophy. So move more, move more, move more in every aspect of life seems to be the takeaway.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah. It's not just more, it's degree also. I think that with age, we recess, we pull backwards, we reach out less even than we can. Partially, the sight begins to decline, the hearing, and a kind of fear sets in. You still have to be able to maintain a fearlessness in regards to boundaries that you don't have to pull up shy. You don't have to pull up short of a boundary.

Twyla Tharp: You can still address that boundary. It's just, you're not going to be able to reach as far across as you could have in each of these different decades. It's just, you know, you could do one thing when you were two years old. You can do another thing now. And it's accepting that everything can give you push back. You have to accept pushback. You have to still accept pushback. It's going to feel differently, but you still want it.

Andrew Huberman: Maybe, that's the thing to seek is that friction point.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: In describing dancers and dance, you talked a lot about taking up space. It's interesting. Now, we're talking about people reflexively taking up less and less space as they get older. Voice occupies space, too. So, it's kind of interesting to think about movement as the fundamental way in which we have action at a distance, or impact at a distance. As you said, recess.

Twyla Tharp: Shrivel

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Twyla Tharp: Shrivel.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah. Yeah. Maybe, that's the thing to fight against.

Twyla Tharp: You know, the word fight, we fight against everything, and I do it too. We all do do it. We got to look at it, I say to myself, as an opportunity. It's not a fight. It's an opportunity to keep the pressure on. I mean, we become frightened.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah, I've seen that in some older folks. There's a fear that sets in.

Twyla Tharp: Right. And that's not necessary, because we also got compensations for no reason. I'm thinking here of Camus, who had twins, and one of them was, for some reason, thinking she was going to go blind. And I guess, she'd been diagnosed. She started practicing being blind.

Twyla Tharp: She started keeping her eyes closed and... She's just a 12-year-old, taking a cane and trying to find her way as a blind person. She could see perfectly well. She was providing against the future. You're not going to provide against death, so just get over it, and keep pushing through like you can see, because you can.

Andrew Huberman: It's like, meet the friction that's there, but at that edge, not any further out.

Twyla Tharp: Right. At a reasonable point, where there is a competition, not where you're pre-defeated.

Andrew Huberman: Speaking of taking up space, you've mentioned before that the fact that your name is Twyla perhaps shaped you in some ways.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Andrew Huberman: I'm fascinated by this, that how names shape our self-perception, how they shape others' perceptions of us, and how, to some extent, we might live into those perceptions.

Twyla Tharp: Yes. My mother, as with everything, provided me with a moniker that would serve me. So the name Twila, she saw in a newspaper, but it was spelled with an "I." The original Twila, who was a pig-calling princess in the next county, Twila, I forget her last name. In any case, my mother changed it to a "Y," because she thought Twyla with a "Y" would look better on a marquee.

Twyla Tharp: Okay? She was right. That the "T" had to be selected for the alliteration between Twyla and Tharp, "T-T." Marilyn Monroe. All stars have got alliterative names. She's not wrong. It makes it easier to remember. It also seems to have a reinforcing quality. One name is a "T," another "T" must be good. Two Ts, right? Yeah, this is all my mother's subliminal thinking to provide me with the course of stardom, should I select, that's what I should go towards.

Andrew Huberman: God bless her.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, that's what I said.

Andrew Huberman: Well, Twyla Tharp. Thank you so much for coming here today.

Twyla Tharp: Yes.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: It is a real honor for me.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah, no. It's fun.

Andrew Huberman: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: It's a real pleasure, a real honor, and I know you are uncomfortable with accolades, so I'm just going to barrel into them by just saying that it's an honor, because I think your work is incredible.

Twyla Tharp: Yeah.

Andrew Huberman: I think the book is incredible. So many people that I told I was going to sit down with you today, I'm surprised they're not beating down the doors outside, and that's because I think you represent a lot more than just incredible elite-level dance and choreography. You certainly represent that, and the arts, and thank you for your comments about supporting the arts.

Andrew Huberman: Those will propagate far and wide, and hopefully have an impact. But you also represent this spirit behind creating things, leaning into friction, but also embracing, for lack of a better word, the dance of it all, including what comes from the outside and the internal process. This is a complicated thing, and I know many, many people want it, or just love to see people striving and creating, and so you really embody that spirit.

Andrew Huberman: And, you know, the words aren't enough to express how grateful I am, and how grateful millions and millions of people are, so thank you.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: So, God bless your mother for naming you Twyla, and God bless you for coming here today.

Twyla Tharp: Thank you, sweetheart. And God bless you for doing this, and for believing it's worthwhile, so thank you.

Andrew Huberman: Thank you.

Andrew Huberman: Thank you for joining me for today's discussion with Twyla Tharp. To learn more about her work and to find a link to her truly spectacular book, "The Creative Habit," please see the show note captions. If you're learning from and/or enjoying this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube channel. That's a terrific zero-cost way to support us.

Andrew Huberman: In addition, please follow the podcast by clicking the "follow" button on both Spotify and Apple. And on both Spotify and Apple, you can leave us up to a five-star review, and you can now leave us comments at both Spotify and Apple.

Andrew Huberman: Please also check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning and throughout today's episode. That's the best way to support this podcast. If you have questions for me, or comments about the podcast, or guests, or topics that you'd like me to consider for the Huberman Lab podcast, please put those in the comments section on YouTube. I do read all the comments.

Andrew Huberman: For those of you that haven't heard, I have a new book coming out. It's my very first book. It's entitled "Protocols: An Operating Manual for the Human Body." This is a book that I've been working on for more than five years, and that's based on more than 30 years of research and experience. And it covers protocols for everything from sleep to exercise to stress control, protocols related to focus and motivation. And of course, I provide the scientific substantiation for the protocols that are included. The book is now available by presale at protocolsbook.com.

Andrew Huberman: There, you can find links to various vendors. You can pick the one that you like best. Again, the book is called "Protocols: An Operating Manual for the Human Body." And if you're not already following me on social media, I am "hubermanlab" on all social media platforms. So that's Instagram, X, Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on all those platforms, I discuss science and science-related tools, some of which overlaps with the content of the Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which is distinct from the information on the Huberman Lab Podcast. Again, it's "hubermanlab" on all social media platforms.

Andrew Huberman: And if you haven't already subscribed to our Neural Network Newsletter, the Neural Network Newsletter is a zero-cost monthly newsletter that includes podcast summaries, as well as what we call protocols in the form of one to three-page PDFs, that cover everything from how to optimize your sleep, how to optimize dopamine, deliberate cold exposure. We have a foundational fitness protocol that covers cardiovascular training and resistance training. All of that is available completely zero-cost.

Andrew Huberman: You simply go to hubermanlab.com, go to the Menu tab in the top right corner, scroll down to Newsletter, and enter your email. And I should emphasize that we do not share your email with anybody. Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with Twyla Tharp. And last but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in science.

‍